Cited by 134Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesEmbodied and Extended CognitionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Supine body position reduces neural response to anger evocation

Harmon-Jones, Eddie, Peterson, Carly K.·2009·Psychological Science

Abstract

Body movements affect emotional processes. For example, adopting the facial expressions of specific emotions (even via unobtrusive manipulations) affects emotional judgments and memories (Laird, 2007). Manipulated body postures can affect behavior: slumped postures lead to more ‘‘helpless behaviors’’ (Riskind & Gotay, 1982). Simple body postures may also affect other emotive responses and the neural activations associated with them. Lying flat on one’s back may be antithetical to approach motivation (i.e., the urge to move toward something). We sought to address this issue, which has implications not only for the study of embodiment, but also for the study of neural processes, because some neuroscience techniques rely on individuals being in supine positions. More than 15 studies using electroencephalographic (EEG) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) methods have suggested that the left prefrontal cortex is more activated than the right prefrontal cortex during the experience of anger, particularly anger associated with approach motivational inclinations (Carver & Harmon-Jones, 2009; van Honk & Schutter, 2006). Tomarken and Zald (2009), however, questioned these effects when they reviewed some functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies that failed to find greater relative left prefrontal cortical activations during anger. One possible explanation of the divergence of the EEG-rTMS and fMRI studies on anger is that the fMRI studies did not evoke an…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02416.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bottom-up influences can shape affective experiences.

    “Although much (if not most) information regarding stress context is assessed via explicit or implicit perception, there is also evidence that bottom up influences can shape affective experiences.”

    From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Harmon-Jones and Peterson, 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harmon-Jones, E., & Peterson, C. K.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2009-10
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
1209-1210
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2040475871
Cited by
134
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
anger, approach motivation, left prefrontal cortex, posture, embodiment, upright posture
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Anger, Electroencephalography, Female, Fourier Analysis, Frontal Lobe, Happiness, Humans, Male, Students, Supine Position

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review