The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causal Binding of Actions to Their Effects
Abstract
According to widely held views in cognitive science harking back to David Hume, causality cannot be perceived directly, but instead is inferred from patterns of sensory experience, and the quality of these inferences is determined by perceivable quantities such as contingency and contiguity. We report results that suggest a reversal of Hume's conjecture: People's sense of time is warped by the experience of causality. In a stimulus-anticipation task, participants' response behavior reflected a shortened experience of time in the case of target stimuli participants themselves had generated, relative to equidistant, equally predictable stimuli they had not caused. These findings suggest that causality in the mind leads to temporal binding of cause and effect, and extend and generalize beyond earlier claims of intentional binding between action and outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
LIBET, B., GLEASON, C. A., WRIGHT, E. W., & PEARL, D. K. (1983) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/106.3.623 · Cited by 2,498
The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07001975 · Cited by 2,031
The mind's best trick: how we experience conscious will
Wegner, D. M. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00002-0 · Cited by 561
Cited by
Hughes, G., Desantis, A., & Waszak, F. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0028566 · Cited by 365
Sloman, S. A., & Lagnado, D. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015135 · Cited by 210
Automation technology and sense of control: A window on human agency
Berberian, B., Sarrazin, J.-C., Le Blaye, P., & Haggard, P. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034075 · Cited by 190
van der Weiden, A., Prikken, M., & van Haren, N. E. M. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.004 · Cited by 101
Mindfulness meditation weakens attachment to self: Evidence from a self vs other binding task
Chiarella, S. G., Makwana, M., Simione, L., Hartkamp, M., Calabrese, L., Raffone, A., & Srinivasan, N. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01457-9 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Buehner, M. J., & Humphreys, G. R.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1221-1228
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2120698676
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causal Binding of Actions to Their Effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02435.x
- The paper
- Buehner, M. J., & Humphreys, G. R. (2009). Causal Binding of Actions to Their Effects. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02435.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.