Cited by 190Free Will and AgencyHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Automation technology and sense of control: A window on human agency

Open access
Berberian, Bruno, Sarrazin, Jean-Christophe, Le Blaye, Patrick, Haggard, Patrick·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the perceived times of voluntary actions and their effects are perceived as shifted towards each other, so that the interval between action and outcome seems shortened. This has been referred to as 'intentional binding' (IB). However, the generality of this effect remains unclear. Here we demonstrate that Intentional Binding also occurs in complex control situations. Using an aircraft supervision task with different autopilot settings, our results first indicated a strong relation between measures of IB and different levels of system automation. Second, measures of IB were related to explicit agency judgement in this applied setting. We discuss the implications for the underlying mechanisms, and for sense of agency in automated environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0034075

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Automation can create a diminished sense of control, responsibility, and moral agency among human operators.

    “Automation can also create a diminished sense of control, responsibility, and moral agency among human operators”

    From The flaws of policies requiring human oversight of government algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Berberian et al., 2012

    The Introduction (‘Automation and feeling of control’; page unavailable) says that increased automation can decrease pilots’ feeling of control, and the study examines operators’ sense of agency at different automation levels. The paper does not address diminished responsibility or moral agency; its agency measures concern perceived causal control. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Automation can reduce its users' sense of control, responsibility, and moral agency.

    “Furthermore, given that automation can reduce its users' sense of control, responsibility, and moral agency ( Berberian et al., 2012 ;Cummings, 2006 ), it is important to continuously monitor whether the algorithm distorts or erodes the moral agency of decision-makers.”

    From The flaws of policies requiring human oversight of government algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Berberian et al., 2012

    The Introduction ('Automation and feeling of control'; page unavailable) says increasing automation can decrease pilots’ feeling of control, and the Results examine agency judgments across automation levels. The passages support reduced felt control, but do not establish reduced responsibility or moral agency. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [3]Gallagher S 2000 Philosophical concepts of the self: implications for cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 14 21 10637618
  2. [6]Young ME Rogers ET Beckmann JS 2005 Causal impressions: predicting when, not just whether. Mem Cogn 33 320 331 16028586
  3. [16]Andersson J Osvalder AL 2009 258 107 110 Levels of Automation and User Control, In VTT Symposium (Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus)
  4. [18]Sheridan T Verplank W 1978 (1978) Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators, Man-Machine Systems Lab., MIT, Cambridge, MA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berberian, B., Sarrazin, J.-C., Le Blaye, P., & Haggard, P.
Affiliations
  • Office National d'Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales (FR)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Berberian, Bruno
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-03-30
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
e34075
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115897811
Cited by
190
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
intentional binding, sense of agency, human agency, system automation, human-automation interaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Automation, Aviation, Awareness, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Biological, Perception, Psychomotor Performance, Sensation, Systems Theory, Technology, Time Perception, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review