The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble
Abstract
As with all new ideas, the concept of Open Innovation requires extensive empirical investigation, testing and development. This paper analyzes Procter and Gamble's ‘Connect and Develop’ strategy as a case study of the major organizational and technological changes associated with open innovation. It argues that although some of the organizational changes accompanying open innovation are beginning to be described in the literature, more analysis is warranted into the ways technological changes have facilitated open innovation strategies, particularly related to new product development. Information and communications technologies enable the exchange of distributed sources of information in the open innovation process. The case study shows that furthermore a suite of new technologies for data mining, simulation, prototyping and visual representation, what we call ‘innovation technology’, help to support open innovation in Procter and Gamble. The paper concludes with a suggested research agenda for furthering understanding of the role played by and consequences of this technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy
Barney, J. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231 · Cited by 5,548
(1993) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195076165.001.0001 · Cited by 3,069
Cited by
Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.007 · Cited by 582
Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation
Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2013) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2013.07.004 · Cited by 470
Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2020) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12313 · Cited by 420
Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem
Radziwon, A., & Bogers, M. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.021 · Cited by 382
Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2010) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00589.x · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Dodgson, M., Gann, D., & Salter, A.
- Venue
- R and D Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-346
- ISSN
- 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9310
- OpenAlex
- W2135260292
- Cited by
- 775
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 64.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00429.x
- The paper
- Dodgson, M., Gann, D., & Salter, A. (2006). The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble. R and D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00429.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.