The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The fuzzy front end of Japanese new product development projects: impact on success and differences between incremental and radical projects
Abstract
This study of Japanese New Product Development (NPD) projects explores the fuzzy front end of innovation. The goal of the paper is twofold: First, we analyse the impact of the fuzzy front end on the success of all the NPD projects. We develop a conceptual model based on the information‐processing approach. A structural equation model was fitted to data from 497 NPD projects in Japanese manufacturing firms to test the proposed model. The empirical analysis suggests that an early reduction of market and technical uncertainty as well as an initial planning before development have a positive impact on NPD project success. The model accounts for 17% of the variance of the efficiency and 24% of the variance of the effectiveness‐dependent variable. Thus, the front end phase is an important driver of NPD project success. Second, we compare the fuzzy front end of incremental to radical NPD projects. Although these projects differ in many aspects of newness, we found only a few differences with regard to the fuzzy front end. For instance, it was more difficult to estimate the market size and price sensitivity of the customers during the fuzzy front end of the radical NPD projects compared with the incremental projects. Implications of the empirical results and limitations of the study are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/376806 · Cited by 5,807
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1920110 · Cited by 3,470
Product development performance: strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-1591 · Cited by 2,389
Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design
Akao, Y. (1990) · Cited by 1,680
Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices
Peter, J. P. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600102 · Cited by 1,592
The new new product development game
(1986) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1016/0737-6782(86)90053-6 · Cited by 1,573
PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices
Griffin, A. (1997) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1460429 · Cited by 1,490
Metadata
- Authors
- Verworn, B., Herstatt, C., & Nagahira, A.
- Venue
- R&D Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12-21
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9310
- OpenAlex
- W1516444285
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 10.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The fuzzy front end of Japanese new product development projects: impact on success and differences between incremental and radical projects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00492.x
- The paper
- Verworn, B., Herstatt, C., & Nagahira, A. (2008). The fuzzy front end of Japanese new product development projects: impact on success and differences between incremental and radical projects. R&D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00492.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.