Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 583

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability*

KITTAY, EVA FEDER·2011·Ratio Juris
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

According to the most important theories of justice, personal dignity is closely related to independence, and the care that people with disabilities receive is seen as a way for them to achieve the greatest possible autonomy. However, human beings are naturally subject to periods of dependency, and people without disabilities are only “temporarily abled.” Instead of seeing assistance as a limitation, we consider it to be a resource at the basis of a vision of society that is able to account for inevitable dependency relationships between “unequals” ensuring a fulfilling life both for the carer and the cared for.**

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 583

Metadata

Authors
KITTAY, E. F.
Venue
Ratio Juris
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-22
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
49-58
ISSN
  • 0952-1917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9337
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x
OpenAlex
W1657990885
Cited by
583
References
12
FWCI
14.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x
The paper
KITTAY, E. F. (2011). The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability*. Ratio Juris. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.