The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Moral Orientation and Moral Development [1987]
Abstract
This chapter presents a similar phenomenon with respect to moral judgment, describing two moral perspectives that organize thinking in different ways. The analogy to ambiguous figure perception arises from the observation that although people are aware of both perspectives, they tend to adopt one or the other in defining and resolving moral conflict. The chapter reconstructs the account of moral development around two moral perspectives, grounded in different dimensions of relationship that give rise to moral concern. The justice perspective, often equated with moral reasoning, is recast as one way of seeing moral problems and a care perspective is brought forward as an alternate vision or frame. The chapter elaborates an analysis of the language and logic of men&s;s and women&s;s moral reasoning about a range of hypothetical and real dilemmas underlies the distinction. It reports an association between moral orientation and gender speak directly to the continuing controversy over sex differences in moral reasoning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20048 · Cited by 1,198
The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability*
KITTAY, E. F. (2011) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x · Cited by 583
Ethical Differences Between Men and Women in The Sales Profession
Dawson, L. M. (1997) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1005721916646 · Cited by 347
Ethical Decision Making in Software Piracy: Initial Development and Test of a Four-Component Model1
Moores, T. T., & Chang, J. C.-J. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148722 · Cited by 340
An exploratory study of service value in the USA and Ecuador
Brady, M. K., & Robertson, C. J. (1999) · International Journal of Service Industry Management · doi:10.1108/09564239910289003 · Cited by 117
Metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moral Orientation and Moral Development [1987]. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780429499463-4
- The paper
- Gilligan, C. (1995). Moral Orientation and Moral Development [1987]. Justice and Care. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499463-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.