The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Virginia Held,The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global(Oxford University Press, 2006)
Abstract
Virginia Held assesses the ethics of care as a promising alternative to the familiar moral theories that serve so inadequately to guide our lives. The ethics of care is only a few decades old, yet it is by now a distinct moral theory or normative approach to the problems we face. It is relevant to global and political matters as well as to the personal relations that can most clearly exemplify care. This book clarifies just what the ethics of care is: what its characteristics are, what it holds, and what it enables us to do. It discusses the feminist roots of this moral approach and why the ethics of care can be a morality with universal appeal. Held examines what we mean by and what a caring person is like. Where other moral theories demand impartiality above all, the ethics of care understands the moral import of our ties to our families and groups. It evaluates such ties, focusing on caring relations rather than simply on the virtues of individuals. The book proposes how such values as justice, equality, and individual rights can fit together with such values as care, trust, mutual consideration, and solidarity. In the second part of the book, Held examines the potential of the ethics of care for dealing with social issues. She shows how the ethics of care is more promising than Kantian moral theory and utilitarianism for advice on how expansive, or not, markets should be, and on when other values than market ones should prevail. She connects the ethics of care with the rising interest in civil society, and considers the limits appropriate for the language of rights. Finally, she shows the promise of the ethics of care for dealing with global problems and seeing anew the outlines of international civility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The caring relation in teaching
Noddings, N. (2012) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2012.745047 · Cited by 787
Caring Masculinities: Theorizing an Emerging Concept
Elliott, K. (2016) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x15576203 · Cited by 695
The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability*
KITTAY, E. F. (2011) · Ratio Juris · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x · Cited by 583
Theory Building: A Review and Integration
Shepherd, D. A., & Suddaby, R. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316647102 · Cited by 403
The Case for Conserving Disability
Garland-Thomson, R. (2012) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-012-9380-0 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahowald, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 177-181
- ISSN
- 1937-4577 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-4585
- OpenAlex
- W2764587809
- Cited by
- 907
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 188.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Virginia Held,The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global(Oxford University Press, 2006). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2979/fab.2009.2.1.177
- The paper
- Mahowald, M. (2009). Virginia Held,The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global(Oxford University Press, 2006). International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. https://doi.org/10.2979/fab.2009.2.1.177
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.