Cited by 101Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The relationship between induced emotional arousal and amnesia

CHRISTIANSON, SVEN‐ÅKE·1984·Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to test a hypothesis emanating from a similarity in data pattern between studies on amnesia and studies on the effects of arousal on memory. The hypothesis was that arousal and amnesia might be related, or more precisely, that amnesia induced in the laboratory might be mediated by high levels of arousal. Subjects in this experiment were presented with a thematic, short story in pictorial form. One version of the story consisted of a traumatic, arousal‐inducing event placed between neutral events. A second version of the story contained the same neutral events in the beginning and the end, but also a neutral event in the middle. Palmar skin conductance, heart rate, and subjective self‐ratings were used to determine that the manipulation made had caused different degrees of emotional arousal for the two groups of subjects presented with the different versions of the story. The methods used to determine memory performance were recall and recognition. The data obtained indicate that amnesia induced in the laboratory is mediated by emotional arousal in terms of concepts of attention and reconstruction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1984.tb01007.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Christianson (1984) noted an increase in skin conductance to stimuli of greater negative emotionality, another index of an orienting response to a stimulus display.

    “Christianson (1984) also noted an increase in skin conductance to stimuli of greater negative emotionality, another index of an orienting response to a stimulus display.”

    From A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory (2004) · cites this paper as Christianson, 1984

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHRISTIANSON, S.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
CHRISTIANSON, SVEN‐ÅKE
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-06
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
147-160
ISSN
  • 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9450
OpenAlex
W2023374814
Cited by
101
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
emotional arousal, amnesia, memory impairment, traumatic events, attention, memory reconstruction, memory retrieval, recognition memory, heart rate, skin conductance
MeSH terms
Adult, Amnesia, Arousal, Attention, Emotions, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review