The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do targets of workplace bullying portray a general victim personality profile?
Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine differences in personality between a group of bullied victims and a non‐bullied group. The 144 participants, comprising of 72 victims and a matched contrast group of 72 respondents, completed Goldberg's (1999) International Personality Item Pool (IPIP). Significant differences emerged between victims and non‐victims on four out of five personality dimensions. Victims tended to be more neurotic and less agreeable, conscientious and extravert than non‐victims. However, a cluster analysis revealed that the victim sample can be divided into two personality groups. One cluster, which comprised 64% of the victim sample, do not differ from non‐victims as far as personality is concerned. Hence, the results indicate that there is no such thing as a general victim personality profile. However, a small cluster of victims tended to be less extrovert, less agreeable, less conscientious, and less open to experience but more emotional unstable than victims in the major cluster and the control group. Further, both clusters of victims scored higher than non‐victims on emotional instability, indicating that personality should not be neglected as being a factor in understanding the bullying phenomenon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1080 · Cited by 4,765
Personality trait structure as a human universal.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.5.509 · Cited by 4,234
The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process
Ross, L. (1977) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60357-3 · Cited by 4,170
(1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,151
Personality Psychology in Europe
Vera-Bermudez, J., Raad, D. B., de Vries, J., García, A. M. P., Sanchez-Elvita, A., & Heck, G. V. (1997) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 2,462
The content and development of mobbing at work
Leymann, H. (1996) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594329608414853 · Cited by 2,270
Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience.
McCrae, R. R. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.52.6.1258 · Cited by 1,765
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.5.853 · Cited by 1,675
Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice
Einarsen, S. V., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2007) · Cited by 1,132
Self-citationHarassment and bullying at work
Einarsen, S. (2000) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1359-1789(98)00043-3 · Cited by 1,009
Self-citation
Cited by
Workplace Victimization: Aggression from the Target's Perspective
Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163703 · Cited by 731
Metadata
- Authors
- GLASØ, L., MATTHIESEN, S. B., NIELSEN, M. B., & EINARSEN, S.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-26
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 313-319
- ISSN
- 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9450
- OpenAlex
- W2130652127
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 35.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do targets of workplace bullying portray a general victim personality profile? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00554.x
- The paper
- GLASØ, L., MATTHIESEN, S. B., NIELSEN, M. B., & EINARSEN, S. (2007). Do targets of workplace bullying portray a general victim personality profile? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00554.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.