Cited by 150Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Broadening the Study of Infant Security of Attachment: Maternal Autonomy‐support in the Context of Infant Exploration

Abstract

Although security of attachment is conceptualised as a balance between infants' attachment and exploratory behaviours, parental behaviours pertaining to infant exploration have received relatively little empirical attention. Drawing from self‐determination theory, this study seeks to improve the prediction of infant attachment by assessing maternal autonomy‐support during infant exploration, in addition to maternal sensitivity. Seventy‐one dyads participated in two home visits. Maternal sensitivity was assessed when the infants were 12 months old, whereas maternal autonomy‐support and infant attachment were assessed at 15 months. The results revealed that autonomy‐support explained an additional portion of the variance in attachment when maternal socioeconomic status and sensitivity were controlled. These results speak to the relevance of a theory‐driven approach to examining maternal behaviours in the context of child exploration.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2010.00574.x

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Ainsworth M. D. S., 1974, The introduction of the child into a social world, 99
  2. Caldwell B. M., 1978, Home observation for measurement of the environment manual
  3. Grossmann K. E., 1993, Emotional organization and concentration on reality in a life course perspective, International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 541
  4. 10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.925 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Thompson R. A., 2008, Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, 348
  7. Waters E., 1995, Caregiving, cultural and cognitive perspectives on secure‐base behaviour and working models: New growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60, 234
  8. Weinfield N. S., 2008, Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, 78

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 150

Metadata

Authors
Whipple, N., Bernier, A., & Mageau, G. A.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Whipple, Natasha
Venue
Social Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-20
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
17-32
ISSN
  • 0961-205X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9507
OpenAlex
W1489523012
Cited by
150
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
infant attachment security, maternal autonomy support, infant exploration, maternal sensitivity, self-determination theory, maternal behavior, home visiting, socioeconomic status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review