The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Essay on Framing and Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology
Abstract
When reviewing the conditions required for the existence of markets, no concept is more useful or appropriate than that of ‘externality’. The concept of externality is effectively central both to economies and to economics. So an attempt to clarify its significance and scope represents a suitable point of departure for renewed efforts at co-operation between sociologists and economists. Rather than highlighting the limitations and weaknesses of the concept with a view to attacking the limitations and weaknesses of economic theory, I intend to show just how useful it is as a tool for understanding the dynamics of markets, drawing upon sociology as an additional resource. I shall approach this task from the perspective of the sociologist of science and techniques. This will allow me not only to highlight the role of investment—in particular technological—in the emergence of economic agents that are capable of strategies and calculation; it will also serve as an incentive to take the ‘performative ’ role of the sciences—and hence also of economics and sociology—more seriously. I shall start by putting my economist’s hat on in order briefly to remind my fellow sociologists of the various ways in which the concept of externality can be defined, together with its practical and theoretical implications. This will lead on to a discussion of the various mechanisms upon which the concept is predicated. I shall then touch first upon what I shall here refer to as ‘framing/overflowing ’ and upon the various issues associated with the identification, measuring and containment of such overflows. I shall subsequently focus my attention on the role played by the technosciences in the proliferation of overflows, highlighting the active role of the social sciences—alongside the natural sciences—in the identification and management of externalities. Finally, I shall draw one of the most important conclusions suggested by this exercise: that the market is not simply expanding, but rather continuously emerging and reemerging, and that its consolidation requires constant and substantial investments. 1. Definition(s) and issues
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Cited by
Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.08.002 · Cited by 788
Tracking the numbers: Across accounting and finance, organizations and markets
Vollmer, H., Mennicken, A., & Preda, A. (2009) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.06.007 · Cited by 174
Cannibalizing the Informal Economy: Frugal Innovation and Economic Inclusion in Africa
Meagher, K. (2018) · The European Journal of Development Research · doi:10.1057/s41287-017-0113-4 · Cited by 175
D’Adderio, L., & Pollock, N. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840614538962 · Cited by 129
Pope, C., Halford, S., Turnbull, J., Prichard, J., Calestani, M., & May, C. (2013) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-111 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Callon, M.
- Venue
- The Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1_suppl
- Pages
- 244-269
- ISSN
- 0038-0261 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-954X
- OpenAlex
- W2015706988
- Cited by
- 1,158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.