CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 631Health, Medicine and SocietySocial Movements and Cultural IdentityCommunity Health and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Embodied health movements: new approaches to social movements in health

Open access
Brown, Phil, Zavestoski, Stephen, McCormick, Sabrina, Mayer, Brian, Morello‐Frosch, Rachel, Gasior Altman, Rebecca·2004·Sociology of Health & Illness
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00378.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Social movements organised around health-related issues have been studied for almost as long as they have existed, yet social movement theory has not yet been applied to these movements. Health social movements (HSMs) are centrally organised around health, and address: (a) access to or provision of health care services; (b) health inequality and inequity based on race, ethnicity, gender, class and/or sexuality; and/or (c) disease, illness experience, disability and contested illness. HSMs can be subdivided into three categories: health access movements seek equitable access to health care and improved provision of health care services; constituency-based health movements address health inequality and health inequity based on race, ethnicity, gender, class and/or sexuality differences; and embodied health movements (EHMs) address disease, disability or illness experience by challenging science on etiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention. These groups address disproportionate outcomes and oversight by the scientific community and/or weak science. This article focuses on embodied health movements, primarily in the US. These are unique in three ways: 1) they introduce the biological body to social movements, especially with regard to the embodied experience of people with the disease; 2) they typically include challenges to existing medical/scientific knowledge and practice; and 3) they often involve activists collaborating with scientists and health professionals in pursuing treatment, prevention, research and expanded funding. This article employs various elements of social movement theory to offer an approach to understanding embodied health movements, and provides a capsule example of one such movement, the environmental breast cancer movement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00378.x

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 76 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Ferguson S.J., 2000, Breast Cancer: Society Shapes an Epidemic
  2. McCarthy J.D., 1977, Resource Mobilization and Social Movements, American Journal of Sociology, 92, 64
  3. Myhre J.R., 2001, Breast cancer activism: A true political movement, Breast Cancer Action Newsletter, 68
  4. Reiss J.R., 2000, Breast Cancer 2000: An Update on the Facts, Figures and Issues
  5. Rosenbaum M.E., 2000, Breast Cancer: Society Shapes an Epidemic
  6. Silent Spring Institute, 1998, The Cape Cod Breast Cancer and Environment Study: Results of the First Three Years of Study
  7. Waitzkin H., 2001, At the Front Lines of Medicine: How the Health Care System Alienates Doctors and Mistreats Patients
  8. Zones J.S., 2000, Breast Cancer: Society Shapes an Epidemic

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Brown, P., Zavestoski, S., McCormick, S., Mayer, B., Morello‐Frosch, R., & Gasior Altman, R.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Phil
ORCID
Venue
Sociology of Health & Illness
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
50-80
ISSN
  • 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9566
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00378.x
OpenAlex
W2030530081
Cited by
631
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
FWCI
40.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 55 d)
Locations
  • Sociology of Health & Illness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9975518)
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
Keywords
health social movements, social movement theory, illness experience, disability, contested illness, health disparities, health care access
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Delivery of Health Care, Politics, Social Change, Social Environment, Social Responsibility, Sociology, Medical, Health Care Rationing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review