The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic professional boundaries in the healthcare workforce
Abstract
The healthcare professions have never been static in terms of their own disciplinary boundaries, nor in their role or status in society. Healthcare provision has been defined by changing societal expectations and beliefs, new ways of perceiving health and illness, the introduction of a range of technologies and, more recently, the formal recognition of particular groups through the introduction of education and regulation. It has also been shaped by both inter‐professional and profession‐state relationships forged over time. A number of factors have converged that place new pressures on workforce boundaries, including an unmet demand for some healthcare services; neo‐liberal management philosophies and a greater emphasis on consumer preferences than professional‐led services. To date, however, there has been little analysis of the evolution of the workforce as a whole. The discussion of workforce change that has taken place has largely been from the perspective of individual disciplines. Yet the dynamic boundaries of each discipline mean that there is an interrelationship between the components of the workforce that cannot be ignored. The purpose of this paper is to describe four directions in which the existing workforce can change: diversification; specialisation and vertical and horizontal substitution, and to discuss the implications of these changes for the workforce.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733
The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis.
Mills, D. L., & Larson, M. S. (1978) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065088 · Cited by 2,954
Professionalism: The Third Logic
Seron, C., & Freidson, E. (2002) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/3090041 · Cited by 2,921
Larson, M. S. (1977) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520323070 · Cited by 2,427
Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge.
Clausen, G. T., & Freidson, E. (1971) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2093843 · Cited by 2,049
Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge.
Denzin, N. K., & Freidson, E. (1971) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2948458 · Cited by 1,717
The Sociology of the Professions
Elliott, P. (1972) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-00711-0 · Cited by 1,217
Orzack, L. H., & Johnson, T. J. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2064035 · Cited by 1,119
The sociology of the professions
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-4232 · Cited by 889
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-1248 · Cited by 796
Cited by
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
(2020) · doi:10.2147/jmdh · Cited by 644
Constellations of Institutional Logics: Changes in the Professional Work of Pharmacists
Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2011) · Work and Occupations · doi:10.1177/0730888411406824 · Cited by 543
Institutional Work to Maintain Professional Power: Recreating the Model of Medical Professionalism
Currie, G., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2012) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612445116 · Cited by 448
Distributing Leadership in Health and Social Care: Concertive, Conjoint or Collective?
Currie, G., & Lockett, A. (2011) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00308.x · Cited by 278
The bargaining of professionalism in emergency care practice: NHS paramedics and higher education
Givati, A., Markham, C., & Street, K. (2018) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-017-9802-1 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Nancarrow, S. A., & Borthwick, A. M.
- Venue
- Sociology of Health & Illness
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 897-919
- ISSN
- 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9566
- OpenAlex
- W2016661919
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 24.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic professional boundaries in the healthcare workforce. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00463.x
- The paper
- Nancarrow, S. A., & Borthwick, A. M. (2005). Dynamic professional boundaries in the healthcare workforce. Sociology of Health & Illness. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00463.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.