Institutional Work to Maintain Professional Power: Recreating the Model of Medical Professionalism
Abstract
The creation of new roles commonly threatens the power and status of elite professionals through the substitution of their labour. In this paper we examine the institutional work carried out by elite professionals to maintain their professional dominance when threatened. Drawing on 11 case sites from the English National Health Service (NHS) where new nursing or medical roles have been introduced, threatening the power and status of specialist doctors, we observed the following. First, the professional elite respond through institutional work to supplant threat of substitution with the opportunity for them to delegate routine tasks to other actors and maintain existing resource and control arrangements over the delivery of services in a way that enhances elite professionals’ status. Second, other professionals outside the professional elite, but relatively powerful within their own professional group, are co-opted by the professional elite to engage in institutional work to maintain existing arrangements. Our work extends Lawrence and Suddaby’s typology of institutional work in three ways. First, we reveal how different types of institutional work interact, and how different types of institutional work cross categories of creating or maintaining institutions. Second, we show how an actor’s social position or status, both intra-professionally as well as inter-professionally, in the institutional field frame the institutional work they engage in. Third, the institutional work o…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Different intra-professional groupings' sensemaking responses to a new technology may exert influence on work around jurisdictional boundaries.
“More broadly, they also draw attention to the influence which such responses may exert on work around jurisdictional boundaries (see Comeau-Vallée and Langley, 2020;Currie et al., 2012).”
From The AI of the Beholder: Intra‐Professional Sensemaking of an Epistemic Technology (2025) · cites this paper as Currie et al., 2012
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455 · see citing works
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461 · see citing works
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733 · see citing works
Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations
GREENHALGH, T., ROBERT, G., MACFARLANE, F., BATE, P., & KYRIAKIDOU, O. (2004) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0887-378x.2004.00325.x · Cited by 7,448 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The AI of the Beholder: Intra‐Professional Sensemaking of an Epistemic Technology
Scarbrough, H., Chen, Y., & Patriotta, G. (2025) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13065 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
- Authors
- Currie, G., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 937-962
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2039745761
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 41.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Studies (publishedVersion)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, sociology, and vocational training
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- institutional work, professional power, medical professionalism, professional elites, new professional roles, nursing role, specialist physicians, co-optation, theorizing, risk, service delivery, National Health Service, interprofessional relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review