Cited by 448Management and Organizational StudiesEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Institutional Work to Maintain Professional Power: Recreating the Model of Medical Professionalism

Currie, Graeme, Lockett, Andy, Finn, Rachael, Martin, Graham, Waring, Justin·2012·Organization Studies

Abstract

The creation of new roles commonly threatens the power and status of elite professionals through the substitution of their labour. In this paper we examine the institutional work carried out by elite professionals to maintain their professional dominance when threatened. Drawing on 11 case sites from the English National Health Service (NHS) where new nursing or medical roles have been introduced, threatening the power and status of specialist doctors, we observed the following. First, the professional elite respond through institutional work to supplant threat of substitution with the opportunity for them to delegate routine tasks to other actors and maintain existing resource and control arrangements over the delivery of services in a way that enhances elite professionals’ status. Second, other professionals outside the professional elite, but relatively powerful within their own professional group, are co-opted by the professional elite to engage in institutional work to maintain existing arrangements. Our work extends Lawrence and Suddaby’s typology of institutional work in three ways. First, we reveal how different types of institutional work interact, and how different types of institutional work cross categories of creating or maintaining institutions. Second, we show how an actor’s social position or status, both intra-professionally as well as inter-professionally, in the institutional field frame the institutional work they engage in. Third, the institutional work o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0170840612445116

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different intra-professional groupings' sensemaking responses to a new technology may exert influence on work around jurisdictional boundaries.

    “More broadly, they also draw attention to the influence which such responses may exert on work around jurisdictional boundaries (see Comeau-Vallée and Langley, 2020;Currie et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Currie, G., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Venue
Organization Studies
Published
2012-07
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
937-962
ISSN
  • 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3044
OpenAlex
W2039745761
Cited by
448
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
41.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Organization Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, sociology, and vocational training
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
institutional work, professional power, medical professionalism, professional elites, new professional roles, nursing role, specialist physicians, co-optation, theorizing, risk, service delivery, National Health Service, interprofessional relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review