Cited by 74Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Simulation driven inferences for multiply imputed longitudinal datasets*

Demirtas, Hakan·2004·Statistica Neerlandica

Abstract

In this article, we demonstrate by simulations that rich imputation models for incomplete longitudinal datasets produce more calibrated estimates in terms of reduced bias and higher coverage rates without duly deflating the efficiency. We argue that the use of supplementary variables that are thought to be potential causes or correlates of missingness or outcomes in the imputation process may lead to better inferential results in comparison to simpler imputation models. The liberal use of these variables is recommended as opposed to the conservative strategy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2004.00271.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with panic symptoms may also have higher rates of depressive symptoms.

    “This finding is important because people with panic symptoms may also have higher rates of depressive symptoms. 33”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Demirtas, H.
Venue
Statistica Neerlandica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
466-482
ISSN
  • 0039-0402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9574
OpenAlex
W1993323182
Cited by
74
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Statistica Neerlandica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
multiple imputation, longitudinal data, missing data, imputation models, supplementary variables, bias mitigation, coverage rate, efficiency, simulation study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review