The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Abstract
Research in the area of educational technology has often been critiqued for a lack of theoretical grounding. In this article we propose a conceptual framework for educational technology by building on Shulrnan's formulation of “pedagogical content knowledge” and extend it to the phenomenon of teachers integrating technology into their pedagogy. This framework is the result of 5 years of work on a program of research focused on teacher professional development and faculty development in higher education. It attempts to capture some of the essential qualities of teacher knowledge required for technology integration in teaching, while addressing the complex, multifaceted, and situated nature of this knowledge. We argue, briefly, that thoughtful pedagogical uses of technology require the development of a complex, situated form of knowledge that we call Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). In doing so, we posit the complex roles of, and interplay among, three main components of learning environments: content, pedagogy, and technology. We argue that this model has much to offer to discussions of technology integration at multiple levels: theoretical, pedagogical, and methodological. In this article, we describe the theory behind our framework, provide examples of our teaching approach based upon the framework, and illustrate the methodological contributions that have resulted from this work.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“First, the absence of systematic training constitutes a persistent structural limitation (Mishra & Koehler, 2006).”
From Adoption and Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching: Multi-Institutional Analysis of Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“The TPACK framework holds that mere exposure to AI tools is insufficient for effective teaching.”
From Adoption and Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching: Multi-Institutional Analysis of Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“Instructors require situated, discipline-specific training that addresses the intersection of AI capabilities (technological knowledge), language pedagogy (pedagogical knowledge), and linguistic content (content knowledge).”
From Adoption and Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching: Multi-Institutional Analysis of Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“Two conceptual frameworks were indicated in literature as frequently used for informing the design of teacher education digital capability programmes, and were well-supported by empirical research.”
From From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework (2020) · cites this paper as Mishra and Koehler's (2006)
In the citing paper
“Unlike SAMR, TPACK does not represent a hierarchy or staged progression, but rather presents a holistic model that theorises the relationship between, and contribution of, technological, pedagogical and content knowledge to effective curriculum learning-focused technology use.”
From From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework (2020) · cites this paper as Mishra and Koehler's (2006)
In the citing paper
“TPACK posits that effective technology integration is not about technology alone, but occurs at the dynamic intersection of three core domains of knowledge: Technological Knowledge (TK) (understanding the tools), Pedagogical Knowledge (PK) (understanding how people learn), and Content Knowledge (CK) (understanding the subject matter). TPACK's central tenet is that pedagogical goals and content”
From Paying the Cognitive Debt: An Experiential Learning Framework for Integrating AI in Social Work Education (2025) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“TPACK emphasizes the dynamic integration of technology, pedagogy, and content (Mishra and Koehler, 2006), which enables teachers to move beyond basic tool operation and align technology with instructional goals.”
From AI teaching innovation behavior among college teachers: a structural equation modeling analysis based on the AI-TPACK framework, teaching self-efficacy, professional identity, and AI literacy (2026) · cites this paper as Mishra and Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“Despite promising developments, significant research gaps persist in understanding the optimal integration mechanisms for AIGC tools in cross-disciplinary learning9.”
From Integrating AI-generated content tools in higher education: a comparative analysis of interdisciplinary learning outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“The independent variables selected for the model were chosen based on a priori theoretical considerations [49–51] and underwent rigorous evaluation for multicollinearity”
In the citing paper
“The TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) framework developed by Mishra & Koehler (2006) sets a crucial foundation for understanding how teachers integrate technologies, such as AI chatbots, into their practices”
From A cross-sectional look at teacher reactions, worries, and professional development needs related to generative AI in an urban school district (2025) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“This finding is in line with previous research that demonstrates that introducing novel technology into classrooms is not just a financial or technical issue.”
From Understanding the determinants of novel technology adoption among teachers: the case of 3D printing (2020) · cites this paper as Mishra and Koehler 2006
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
DEWEY, J. M. (1986) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131728609335764 · Cited by 13,872
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
Educating the reflective practitioner
Schön, D. A. (1987) · Cited by 11,335
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 · Cited by 8,742
(2014) · Palgrave Macmillan eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137399595.0007 · Cited by 8,328
DEWEY, J. M. (2026) · State University of New York Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9798855805482-007 · Cited by 5,217
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Project 2061: Proceedings of the second AAAS technology education research conference. Washington DC: Author.
- Anderson R. D., and Mitchner C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In and and Gabel D.L. (Ed.), Handbook of science teaching and learning (pp. 32—37). New York: Macmillan.
- Barab S. A., and Duffy T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In Jonassen D., and Land S. (Eds.), Theoretical foundation of learning environments (pp. 25—56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- 10.1177/016146810110300601 · DOI · Paper page
- Grossman P. (1990). The making of a teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Harel I., and Papert S. (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Koehler M. J., and Mishra P. (2002). Art from randomness. How Inverso uses chance to create haiku [Electronic version]. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 4(1). Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2002/1/03/index.asp
- Lankshear C. (1997). Changing literacies. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- Medawar P. B. (1963). Is the scientific paper a fraud? In and and Medawar P.B. (Ed.), The Threat and the glory (pp. 228—233). New York: HarperCollins.
- Mishra P. (1998). Learning complex concepts in chemistry with multiple representations: Theory based design and evaluation of a hypertext for the periodic system of elements. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
- 10.1108/978-1-60752-582-020251002 · DOI
- Papert S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In Papert S., and Harel I. (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1—11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Selfe C. (1990). Technology in the English classroom: Computers through the lens of feminist pedagogy. In and and Handa C. (Ed.), Computers and community: Teaching composition in the twenty-first century (pp. 118—139). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
- Simon H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Veal W. R., and MaKinster J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies [Electronic version]. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4). Retrieved June 28, 2004 from http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/ejsev3n4.html.
- Vyas S., and Mishra P. (2002). The re-design of an after-school reading club. In Garner R., Gillingham M., and Zhao Y. (Eds.), Hanging out: After-school community based programs for children (pp. 75—93). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
- Wong D., Mishra P., Koehler M. J., and Siebenthal S. (in press). Teacher as filmmaker: iVideos, technology education, and professional development. In Girod M., and Steed J. (Eds.), Technology in the college classroom. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
- Zhao Y. (Ed.). (2003). What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
- Zhao Y., and Conway P. (2001). What's in and what's out? An analysis of state technology plans. Teachers College Record. Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=10717
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Desimone, L. M. (2009) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x08331140 · Cited by 4,862
What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013) · Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/002205741319300303 · Cited by 2,790
Self-citationScherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 · Cited by 1,923
Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551 · Cited by 2,556
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544 · Cited by 2,202
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1017-1054
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W2123184471
- Cited by
- 12,604
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1812 · 2025: 1418 · 2024: 1168 · 2023: 1182 · 2022: 975 · 2021: 874 · 2020: 715 · 2019: 644 · 2018: 605 · 2017: 509 · 2016: 515 · 2015: 571 · 2014: 395 · 2013: 394 · 2012: 262
- FWCI
- 299.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- technological pedagogical content knowledge, TPCK, pedagogical content knowledge, teacher knowledge, technology integration in teaching, teacher professional development, faculty development, higher education, situated knowledge, conceptual framework, educational technology theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
