Cited by 94Semantic Web and OntologiesGeographic Information Systems StudiesBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Observation-driven geo-ontology engineering

Janowicz, Krzysztof·2012·Transactions in GIS

Abstract

Abstract Big Data, Linked Data, Smart Dust, Digital Earth, and e‐Science are just some of the names for research trends that surfaced over the last years. While all of them address different visions and needs, they share a common theme: How do we manage massive amounts of heterogeneous data, derive knowledge out of them instead of drowning in information, and how do we make our findings reproducible and reusable by others? In a network of knowledge, topics span across scientific disciplines and the idea of domain ontologies as common agreements seems like an illusion. In this work, we argue that these trends require a radical paradigm shift in ontology engineering away from a small number of authoritative, global ontologies developed top‐down, to a high number of local ontologies that are driven by application needs and developed bottom‐up out of observation data. Similarly as the early Web was replaced by a social Web in which volunteers produce data instead of purely consuming it, the next generation of knowledge infrastructures has to enable users to become knowledge engineers themselves. Surprisingly, existing ontology engineering frameworks are not well suited for this new perspective. Hence, we propose an observation‐driven ontology engineering framework, show how its layers can be realized using specific methodologies, and relate the framework to existing work on geo‐ontologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01342.x

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ODOE supports both human and technical sensors, and is therefore useful to consider when pairing quantitative and qualitative data.

    “ODOE supports both human and technical sensors, and is therefore useful to consider when pairing quantitative (usually coming from technical sensors) and qualitative data (mostly produced by humans).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janowicz, K.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Janowicz, Krzysztof
Venue
Transactions in GIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-28
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
351-374
ISSN
  • 1361-1682 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9671
OpenAlex
W1950879617
Cited by
94
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transactions in GIS (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
geo-ontology, local ontologies, observation data, knowledge engineering, heterogeneous data management, knowledge infrastructure, big data, linked data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review