Cited by 45Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Cross‐language transfer of orthographic processing skills: a study of French children who learn English at school

Commissaire, Eva, Duncan, Lynne G., Casalis, Séverine·2011·Journal of Research in Reading

Abstract

This study explores the nature of orthographic processing skills among French‐speaking children in Grades 6 and 8 who are learning English at school as a second language (L2). Two aspects of orthographic processing skills are thought to form a convergent construct in monolingual beginning readers: word‐specific knowledge (e.g. rain‐rane) and sensitivity to sub‐lexical regularities (e.g. schoal‐sckoal). The present study examines these components in the first language (L1) reading of older children and charts the cross‐language transfer of orthographic skills during the first 3 years of L2 learning. Word‐specific orthographic knowledge in L2 correlates with L1 reading speed and results reveal direct cross‐language transfer for this component of orthographic processing skill. However, no evidence is found for transfer of sensitivity to sub‐lexical regularities. The concept of cross‐language transfer in relation to these different components of orthographic processing is discussed with reference to L1 and L2 literacy skills in this school acquisition context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01473.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-linguistic transfer of orthographic skills appears to be impacted by the writing systems of the two languages.

    “Cross-linguistic transfer of orthographic skills appears to be impacted by the writing systems of the two languages.”

    From Do word-level skills show cross-linguistic transfer and predict bilingual reading? (2026) · cites this paper as Commissaire et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Commissaire, E., Duncan, L. G., & Casalis, S.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Venue
Journal of Research in Reading
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
59-76
ISSN
  • 0141-0423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9817
OpenAlex
W1529517718
Cited by
45
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Reading (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
  • LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Université de Lille
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
cross-language transfer, orthographic processing, French-speaking children, English as a second language, second language literacy, beginning readers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review