Cross‐language transfer of orthographic processing skills: a study of French children who learn English at school
Abstract
This study explores the nature of orthographic processing skills among French‐speaking children in Grades 6 and 8 who are learning English at school as a second language (L2). Two aspects of orthographic processing skills are thought to form a convergent construct in monolingual beginning readers: word‐specific knowledge (e.g. rain‐rane) and sensitivity to sub‐lexical regularities (e.g. schoal‐sckoal). The present study examines these components in the first language (L1) reading of older children and charts the cross‐language transfer of orthographic skills during the first 3 years of L2 learning. Word‐specific orthographic knowledge in L2 correlates with L1 reading speed and results reveal direct cross‐language transfer for this component of orthographic processing skill. However, no evidence is found for transfer of sensitivity to sub‐lexical regularities. The concept of cross‐language transfer in relation to these different components of orthographic processing is discussed with reference to L1 and L2 literacy skills in this school acquisition context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cross-linguistic transfer of orthographic skills appears to be impacted by the writing systems of the two languages.
“Cross-linguistic transfer of orthographic skills appears to be impacted by the writing systems of the two languages.”
From Do word-level skills show cross-linguistic transfer and predict bilingual reading? (2026) · cites this paper as Commissaire et al., 2011
Cites
Linguistic Interdependence and the Educational Development of Bilingual Children
Cummins, J. (1979) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1169960 · Cited by 3,318 · see citing works
Abu-Rabia, S., & Siegel, L. S. (2002) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1023/a:1021221206119 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Reading, syntactic, and working memory skills of bilingual Portuguese-English Canadian children
Da Fontoura, H. A., & Siegel, L. S. (1995) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/bf01026951 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Deacon, S. H., Wade‐Woolley, L., & Kirby, J. R. (2009) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01392.x · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Do word-level skills show cross-linguistic transfer and predict bilingual reading?
Xie, Q., & Yeung, S. S.-S. (2026) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-026-10767-8
- Authors
- Commissaire, E., Duncan, L. G., & Casalis, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Dundee (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Reading
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-76
- ISSN
- 0141-0423 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9817
- OpenAlex
- W1529517718
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Reading (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
- LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Université de Lille
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- cross-language transfer, orthographic processing, French-speaking children, English as a second language, second language literacy, beginning readers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review