The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neo‐Hymesian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom
Abstract
This paper describes the development of ‘linguistic ethnography’ in Britain over the last 5–15 years. British anthropology tends to overlook language, and instead, the U.K. Linguistic Ethnography Forum (LEF) has emerged from socio‐ and applied linguistics, bringing together a number of formative traditions (inter alia, Interactional Sociolinguistics, New Literacy Studies and Critical Discourse Analysis). The career paths and the institutional positions of LEF participants make their ethnography more a matter of getting analytic distance on what's close‐at‐hand than a process of getting familiar with the strange. When linked with post‐structuralism more generally, this ‘from‐inside‐outwards’ trajectory produces analytic sensibilities tuned to discourse analysis as a method, doubtful about ‘comprehensive’ and ‘exotic’ ethnography, and well disposed to practical/political intervention. LE sits comfortably in the much broader shift from mono‐ to inter‐disciplinarity in British higher education, though the inter‐disciplinary environment makes it hard to take the relationship between linguistics and ethnography for granted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fee, D., & Fairclough, N. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074659 · Cited by 11,611
Gumperz, J. J. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611834 · Cited by 5,861
Kramsch, C. (2014) · AILA Review · doi:10.1075/aila.27.02kra · Cited by 1,539
Fairclough, N. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315845661 · Cited by 934
Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet
Scollon, S. W., & Scollon, S. W. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203694343 · Cited by 700
Cited by
Marked and Unmarked Translanguaging in Accelerated, Mainstream, and Sheltered English Classrooms
Beiler, I. R. (2021) · Multilingua · doi:10.1515/multi-2020-0022 · Cited by 75
Language alternation and language norm in vocational content and language integrated learning
Kontio, J., & Sylvén, L. K. (2015) · The Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2015.1053279 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Rampton, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Sociolinguistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10-18
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 584-607
- ISSN
- 1360-6441 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9841
- OpenAlex
- W1850864400
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 78.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.