The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Forecasting Murder Within a Population of Probationers and Parolees: A High Stakes Application of Statistical Learning
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Forecasts of future dangerousness are often used to inform the sentencing decisions of convicted offenders. For individuals who are sentenced to probation or paroled to community supervision, such forecasts affect the conditions under which they are to be supervised. The statistical criterion for these forecasts is commonly called recidivism, which is defined as a charge or conviction for any new offence, no matter how minor. Only rarely do such forecasts make distinctions on the basis of the seriousness of offences. Yet seriousness may be central to public concerns, and judges are increasingly required by law and sentencing guidelines to make assessments of seriousness. At the very least, information about seriousness is essential for allocating scarce resources for community supervision of convicted offenders. The paper focuses only on murderous conduct by individuals on probation or parole. Using data on a population of over 60000 cases from Philadelphia’s Adult Probation and Parole Department, we forecast whether each offender will be charged with a homicide or attempted homicide within 2 years of beginning community supervision. We use a statistical learning approach that makes no assumptions about how predictors are related to the outcome. We also build in the costs of false negative and false positive charges and use half of the data to build the forecasting model, and the other half of the data to evaluate the quality of the forecasts. Forecasts that are based on this approach offer the possibility of concentrating rehabilitation, treatment and surveillance resources on a small subset of convicted offenders who may be in greatest need, and who pose the greatest risk to society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“For instance, Berk et al. evaluated their model only on the set of defendants who have been granted parole.”
From The Selective Labels Problem: Evaluating Algorithmic Predictions in the Presence of Unobservables (2017) · cites this paper as [7]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This assumption does not typically hold in cases where human decisions are providing data labels [7, 21].”
From The Selective Labels Problem: Evaluating Algorithmic Predictions in the Presence of Unobservables (2017) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While prior research has explored applications of machine learning to domains where human judgments are part of the data labeling process (crime [7, 21, 43], medical diagnosis [6, 22]), the selective labels problem is often overlooked, with evaluation of the models typically carried out by computing traditional metrics such as AUC or accuracy only on the data points for which ground truth labels”
From The Selective Labels Problem: Evaluating Algorithmic Predictions in the Presence of Unobservables (2017) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,867
Classification and Regression Trees.
Ryzin, J. V., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288003 · Cited by 21,030
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5328.918 · Cited by 11,999
Friedman, J. H. (2002) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/s0167-9473(01)00065-2 · Cited by 7,067
Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution
Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A., Zeileis, A., & Hothorn, T. (2007) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-25 · Cited by 3,970
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Allen, 2007, Justice reinvestment: a new approach to crime and justice
- Anderson, 1999, Code of the Street
- Ayres, 2007, Supercrunchers: how Anything can be Predicted
- Burgess, 1928, The Working of the Indeterminant Sentence Law and the Parole System in Illinois, 205
- Gottfredson, 1987, Prediction and Classification
- Gottfredson, 1987, Prediction and Classification
- Maltz, 1984, Recidvism
- Malvestuto, 2007, Testimony to Committee on Public Safety, Council of the City of Philadelphia
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., & Huq, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098095 · Cited by 1,149
The Rise of Evidence-Based Policing: Targeting, Testing, and Tracking
Sherman, L. W. (2013) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/670819 · Cited by 619
Self-citationDurlauf, S. N., & Nagin, D. S. (2011) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00680.x · Cited by 415
Neurocriminology: implications for the punishment, prediction and prevention of criminal behaviour
Glenn, A. L., & Raine, A. (2013) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3640 · Cited by 339
“Machine-leaning techniques such as random forest have already been documented to improve the prediction of future charges of homicide or attempted homicide using traditionally available demographic and social variables 104 .”
MethodInterpretation of nonlinear relationships between process variables by use of random forests
Auret, L., & Aldrich, C. (2012) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2012.05.008 · Cited by 281
Youth violence: What we know and what we need to know.
Bushman, B. J., Newman, K. S., Calvert, S. L., Downey, G., Dredze, M. H., Gottfredson, M. R., Jablonski, N. G., Masten, A. S., Morrill, C., Neill, D. B., et al. (2016) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0039687 · Cited by 225
“Maryland; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Washington, DC, to predict those individuals on probation or parole most likely to murder or commit other crimes (Berk, Sherman, Barnes, Kurtz, & Ahlman, 2009).”
BackgroundSaunders, J., Hunt, P., & Hollywood, J. S. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-016-9272-0 · Cited by 193
“Examples here include models predicting the risk of persons under community supervision reoffending (Berk 2008, 2011; Berk and Bleich 2013; Berk et al. 2009; Wright et al. 1984) and models assessing the risk that a gang affiliate will be involved in violence as a function of their social relationships (Papachristos 20…”
BackgroundSherman, L. W. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-007-9044-y · Cited by 183
“With over 50,000 active cases at any given time, a 30-year data set showing all clients who are later charged with murder or attempted murder yields an ample haystack in which to find the power few “needles.” Using a nonlinear data mining approach to exploratory analysis, Berk et al. (2007) have developed a relatively…”
BackgroundSelf-citationStatistical Procedures for Forecasting Criminal Behavior
Berk, R. A., & Bleich, J. (2013) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12047 · Cited by 180
“…jurisprudential concerns about “actuarial methods” dating from at least the time when sentencing guidelines first became popular (Feeley and Simon, 1994; Messinger and Berk, 1987), and more recent discussions about the role of race have introduced an important overlay (Berk, 2009; Harcourt, 2007).”
Self-citationActuarial Sentencing: An “Unsettled” Proposition
Hannah‐Moffat, K. (2012) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.682603 · Cited by 166
Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction
Zeng, J., Ustun, B., & Rudin, C. (2017) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/rssa.12227 · Cited by 220
“There has been some controversy as to whether sophisticated machine learning methods (such as random forests, Breiman 2001b, Berk et al. 2009, Ritter 2013) are necessary to produce accurate predictive models of recidivism, or if traditional approaches such as logistic regression would suffice (see,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJohndrow, J. E., & Lum, K. (2019) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/18-aoas1201 · Cited by 141
“…of individuals’ future behavior are used to inform judges regarding pre-trial release and bail setting, sentencing, and parole [Phillips et al., 2016, Dieterich et al., 2016, Brennan et al., 2009, Cunningham and Sorensen, 2006, Dvoskin and Heilbrun, 2001, Quinsey et al., 1998, Berk et al., 2009].”
BackgroundMartini, C. H., Boon, M., Broens, S. J. L., Hekkelman, E. F., Oudhoff, L. A., Buddeke, A. W., & Dahan, A. (2015) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000000757 · Cited by 140
Forecasting Domestic Violence: A Machine Learning Approach to Help Inform Arraignment Decisions
Berk, R. A., Sorenson, S. B., & Barnes, G. C. (2016) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/jels.12098 · Cited by 140
“…levels (Berk et al. 2006), homicides committed by probationers or parolees to identify individuals who pose a very serious threat to public safety (Berk et al. 2009), arrests for three different categories of crime committed while on probation or parole to rationalize the intensity of supervision…”
BackgroundSelf-citationLearning to Detect Patterns of Crime
Wang, T., Rudin, C. D., Wägner, D., & Sevieri, R. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40994-3_33 · Cited by 126
“The goal of crime data mining is to understand patterns in criminal behavior in order to predict crime, anticipate criminal activity and prevent it (e.g., see [1]).”
BackgroundReducing fatal police shootings as system crashes: Research, theory, and practice
Sherman, L. W. (2018) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092409 · Cited by 120
“No prediction studies appear to have been done based on the prior performance histories of police officers using the methods pioneered by Berk et al. (2009).”
MethodSelf-citationReducing gun violence in America: informing policy with evidence and analysis
Webster, D. W. (2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-1167 · Cited by 116
A review of data mining applications in crime
Hassani, H., Huang, X., Silva, E. S., & Ghodsi, M. (2016) · Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal · doi:10.1002/sam.11312 · Cited by 118
“[114] in describing the precursors of homicide by accounting for the relative costs of forecasting errors.”
BackgroundThe Selective Labels Problem: Evaluating Algorithmic Predictions in the Presence of Unobservables
Lakkaraju, H., Kleinberg, J., Leskovec, J., Ludwig, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098066 · Cited by 138
“While prior research has explored applications of machine learning to domains where human judgments are part of the data labeling process (crime [7, 21, 43], medical diagnosis [6, 22]), the selective labels problem is oen overlooked, with evaluation of the models typically carried out by computing traditional metrics…”
BackgroundInfluentialPredictive Policing as a New Tool for Law Enforcement? Recent Developments and Challenges
Hardyns, W., & Rummens, A. (2017) · European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10610-017-9361-2 · Cited by 102
Grouped feature importance and combined features effect plot
Au, Q., Herbinger, J., Stachl, C., Bischl, B., & Casalicchio, G. (2022) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-022-00840-5 · Cited by 98
“, 2002), criminology (Berk et al., 2009), and increasingly in the social sciences (Stachl et al.”
BackgroundTravaini, G. V., Pacchioni, F., Bellumore, S., Bosia, M., & Micco, F. D. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191710594 · Cited by 93
“Conclusions The implementation of quantitative and qualitative methods to predict criminal recidivism could be a useful tool in the field of criminal justice [3–5] However, although research in this area is steadily increasing [7], its use in judicial practice is still limited [8] due to the controversial views [9–12].”
BackgroundMethodBerk, R. A., Barnes, G. C., Ahlman, L., & Kurtz, E. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-010-9095-3 · Cited by 78
Self-citationBrakel, R. E. V., & Hert, P. D. (2011) · VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) · Cited by 75
Duwe, G. (2013) · Criminal Justice Policy Review · doi:10.1177/0887403413478821 · Cited by 68
Predicting Recidivism in Homicide Offenders Using Classification Tree Analysis
Neuilly, M.-A., Zgoba, K. M., Tita, G., & Lee, S. S. (2011) · Homicide Studies · doi:10.1177/1088767911406867 · Cited by 59
“…or to test the use of ICT-like techniques on different populations as well as evaluating their performance by comparing them to other actuarial strategies (Silver et al., 2000; Stalans et al., 2004) or establishing prediction error rates using Out Of the Bag (OOB) observations (Berk et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUsing Logistic Regression Modeling to Predict Sexual Recidivism
Duwe, G., & Freske, P. (2012) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063211429470 · Cited by 59
Duwe, G., & Kim, K. (2015) · Criminal Justice Policy Review · doi:10.1177/0887403415604899 · Cited by 59
“In contrast, the tools designed by Berk et al. (2009) and Barnes and Hyatt (2012) are fully automated and specific to one jurisdiction (Philadelphia).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialForecasting Methods in Crime and Justice
Berk, R. A. (2008) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112812 · Cited by 58
Self-citationTargeting Escalation of Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from 52,000 Offenders
Barnham, L., Barnes, G. C., & Sherman, L. W. (2017) · Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing · doi:10.1007/s41887-017-0008-9 · Cited by 56
“Although development of this method would require further research in order to identify additional variables and sources of data for inclusion in the predictionmodel tomake predictions, statistically validated forecasts have consistently been shown to be more accurate or at least as good as clinical predictions such a…”
MethodSelf-citationPredicting and Preventing Gun Violence: An Experimental Evaluation of READI Chicago
Bhatt, M., Heller, S., Kapustin, M., Bertrand, M., & Blattman, C. (2023) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjad031 · Cited by 55
Low-intensity community supervision for low-risk offenders: a randomized, controlled trial
Barnes, G., Ahlman, L., Gill, C., Sherman, L., Kurtz, E., & Malvestuto, R. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-010-9094-4 · Cited by 62
“Berk et al. (2009) provide a detailed description of the basic statistical techniques used in this revised model to forecast risk.”
InfluentialSelf-citationPolicing Domestic Violence 1967–2017
Sherman, L. W. (2018) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12365 · Cited by 54
“A promising advance in targeting methods for prevention of high-harm domestic abuse is the development of “big data” forecasting using “random forests” algorithms of the kind that predict murder and other serious crime (Berk, Sherman, Barnes, Kurtz, and Ahlman, 2009) .”
Self-citationThe problem of success: What is a ‘good’ homicide investigation?
Brookman, F., & Innes, M. (2013) · Policing & Society · doi:10.1080/10439463.2013.771538 · Cited by 53
“Moreover, attempts have been made in recent years to develop tools for predicting murder among offenders on probation and parole (see Berk et al. 2008).”
BackgroundHomicide offender recidivism: A review of the literature
Liem, M. C. A. (2012) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.08.001 · Cited by 53
Berk, R. A. (2013) · Security Informatics · doi:10.1186/2190-8532-2-5 · Cited by 52
“Examples of categorical outcomes include whether or not an individual on probation or parole is arrested for a homicide [18], whether there is a repeat incident of domestic violence in a household [19], and different rule infractions for which a prison inmate may have been reported [20].”
BackgroundSelf-citationVittes, K. A., Vernick, J. S., & Webster, D. W. (2012) · Injury Prevention · doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040290 · Cited by 52
Asymmetric Loss Functions for Forecasting in Criminal Justice Settings
Berk, R. A. (2010) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-010-9098-2 · Cited by 51
“In many instances, relative costs can be elicited from stakeholders, at least to the satisfaction of those stakeholders (Berk et al. 2009; Berk 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationDuwe, G. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-018-9325-7 · Cited by 47
Valasik, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.06.001 · Cited by 46
What You Can and Can’t Properly Do with Regression
Berk, R. A. (2010) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-010-9116-4 · Cited by 46
“Machine learning is also finding its way into the criminology journals (Berk et al. 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Accuracy of the Violent Offender Identification Directive Tool to Predict Future Gun Violence
Wheeler, A. P., Worden, R. E., & Silver, J. R. (2019) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854818824378 · Cited by 43
Forecasts of Violence to Inform Sentencing Decisions
Berk, R. A., & Bleich, J. (2013) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-013-9195-0 · Cited by 43
Self-citationAl Capone, the Sword of Damocles, and the Police-Corrections Budget Ratio
Sherman, L. W. (2011) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00700.x · Cited by 41
“The forecast can be based, as in our earlier work (Berk et al., 2009), on criminal history, age, local crime rate, and other objective, nonprotected characteristics (thus excluding gender, race, religion, and national origin).”
BackgroundSelf-citationForecasting Organized Crime Homicides: Risk Terrain Modeling of Camorra Violence in Naples, Italy
Dugato, M., Calderoni, F., & Berlusconi, G. (2017) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260517712275 · Cited by 39
Dudfield, G., Angel, C. M., Sherman, L. W., & Torrence, S. (2017) · Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing · doi:10.1007/s41887-017-0001-3 · Cited by 39
Self-citationDoyle, R., & Barnes, G. C. (2020) · Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing · doi:10.1007/s41887-020-00051-2 · Cited by 37
“The random forest approach to forecasting (Barnes 2019; Barnes and Hyatt 2012; Berk et al. 2009) computes likelihood through a series of random decision trees, and provides far greater accuracy than OR calculations, regardless of the sample size.”
BackgroundSelf-citationBarnes, G. C., Hyatt, J. M., Ahlman, L., & Kent, D. T. L. (2012) · Journal of Crime and Justice · doi:10.1080/0735648x.2012.679874 · Cited by 37
“2009 ), which yielded predictions of their future offending over the subsequent two years.”
BackgroundSelf-citationBarnes, G. C., Hyatt, J. M., & Sherman, L. W. (2016) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854816673862 · Cited by 36
“This approach to actuarial forecasting was strictly limited to predicting the future dangerousness of the offenders (Barnes & Hyatt, 2012; Berk, 2008; Berk et al., 2009), and their criminogenic needs were neither assessed, nor considered.”
BackgroundSelf-citationDeveloping a Crime Harm Index for Western Australia: the WACHI
House, P. D., & Neyroud, P. (2018) · Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing · doi:10.1007/s41887-018-0022-6 · Cited by 37
The Use of Risk Assessment in Sentencing
van Ginneken, E. F. J. C. (2019) · Hart Publishing eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781509921447.ch-002 · Cited by 38
“Machine learning techniques have enabled the search for instruments that can detect more complex patterns than traditional regression-based instruments (Berk and Bleich 2013; Berk et al. 2009).”
BackgroundDo industry returns predict the stock market? A reprise using the random forest
Ciner, C. (2018) · The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.qref.2018.11.001 · Cited by 33
Özkan, T., Clipper, S. J., Piquero, A., Baglivio, M. T., & Wolff, K. T. (2020) · Sexual abuse. A Journal of Research and Treatment · doi:10.1177/1079063219852944 · Cited by 29
“While others concluded that the prediction accuracy of machine learning models could outperform more traditional methods (Berk & Bleich, 2013; Goss & Vozikis, 2002; Razi & Athappilly, 2005), the predictive accuracy of inductive models varies across this body of literature; machine learning models show promise in incre…”
BackgroundIsolating modeling effects in offender risk assessment
Hamilton, Z. K., Neuilly, M.-A., Lee, S., & Barnoski, R. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-014-9221-8 · Cited by 33
“Nonetheless, it is important to note that RFs do possess some very attractive qualities, including overfit reduction (Breiman 2001b), ability to identify interactions, and tuning for relative costs of false positives/false negatives (Berk et al. 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Role of Race in Forecasts of Violent Crime
Berk, R. (2009) · Race and Social Problems · doi:10.1007/s12552-009-9017-z · Cited by 41
“Studies of parole or probation outcomes have typically been concerned with any failures, from technical violations to the the most serious crimes (Berk, 2008b; Berk et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationWhat to do with Contradictory Data? Approaches to the Integration of Multiple Malingering Measures
Rosenfeld, B. D., Green, D., Pivovarova, E., Dole, T., & Zapf, P. A. (2010) · International Journal of Forensic Mental Health · doi:10.1080/14999013.2010.499559 · Cited by 30
“Although statistical methods exist for minimizing this capitalization on chance (eg, Berk, Sherman, Barnes, Kurtz, & Ahlman, 2010 ), these approaches require far greater sample sizes than are typically available in clinical research.”
MethodFinding Patterns with a Rotten Core: Data Mining for Crime Series with Cores
Wang, T., Rudin, C. D., Wägner, D., & Sevieri, R. (2015) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2014.0021 · Cited by 30
“47 50 Model Formulation Our data consist of entities (crimes) V , each of which has a vector of features.”
Rothschild‐Elyassi, G., Koehler, J., & Simon, J. S. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119372394.ch14 · Cited by 31
Howard, P. (2017) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854816678899 · Cited by 25
Tollenaar, N., & van der Heijden, P. G. M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213245 · Cited by 27
Personalized Risk Assessments in the Criminal Justice System
Goel, S., Rao, J. M., & Shroff, R. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.p20161028 · Cited by 27
“More recently, Berk et al. (2009) developed a risk assessment tool for the Philadelphia Adult Probation and Parole Department (APPD) to sort offenders into three categories: the highest-risk offenders are considered likely to commit a subsequent violent offense; medium-risk offenders are equally likely to commit a new…”
MethodA machine learning analysis of serious misconduct among Australian police
Cubitt, T. I. C., Wooden, K., & Roberts, K. (2020) · Crime Science · doi:10.1186/s40163-020-00133-6 · Cited by 26
Roman, C. G., Klein, H. J., & Wolff, K. T. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-017-9308-0 · Cited by 26
Data-based Computational Approaches to Forecasting Political Violence
Schrodt, P. A., Yonamine, J. E., & Bagozzi, B. E. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5311-6_7 · Cited by 25
“In social science applications of tree-based algorithms, [16] and [17] demonstrates that random forests can help generate accurate forecasts of violent crime rates in the United States.”
BackgroundLoeffler, C. E., & Grunwald, B. (2015) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427815581858 · Cited by 25
“Model 2 is only plausible if the relationship between age and rearrest is linear, which is unlikely given past research on the age–crime curve (Berk et al. 2009; Gendreau, Little, and Goggin 1996).”
BackgroundResultPredicting and Preventing Gun Violence: An Experimental Evaluation of READI Chicago
Bhatt, M., Heller, S., Kapustin, M., Bertrand, M., & Blattman, C. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w30852 · Cited by 24
Learning to rank spatio-temporal event hotspots
Mohler, G., Porter, M. D., Carter, J. G., & Lafree, G. D. (2020) · Crime Science · doi:10.1186/s40163-020-00112-x · Cited by 22
Duwe, G., & Kim, K. (2016) · Corrections · doi:10.1080/23774657.2016.1178083 · Cited by 21
“However, there are quite a few risk-assessment instruments that are deployed with an underlying script from a regression model (see Northpointe, 2015) or a machine learning algorithm (see Berk et al., 2008).”
BackgroundSentinel Events Preceding Youth Firearm Violence
Sumner, S. A., Maenner, M. J., Socias‐Morales, C., Mercy, J. A., Silverman, P., Medinilla, S. P., Martin, S. S., Xu, L., & Hillis, S. D. (2016) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.002 · Cited by 20
Predicting First-Time Sexual Offending Among Prisoners Without a Prior Sex Offense History
Duwe, G. (2012) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854812453911 · Cited by 20
Hu, X., Zhang, X., & Lovrich, N. P. (2020) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2020.1806161 · Cited by 19
“…in a criminal justice/criminology in a number of areas such as forecasting victimization, recidivism, informing arraignment decisions, and determining the costs of intervention programs (e.g., Barnes & Hyatt, 2012; Berk et al., 2009; Berk et al., 2016; Manning et al., 2018; Neuilly et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMethodQiu, T., Wang, S., Hu, D., Feng, N., & Cui, L. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14010073 · Cited by 29
“It has been observed that robust tree-based classification algorithms can effectively predict such behaviors [9,39,40], which can more accurately divide individuals into non-risk and risk groups, especially when the risk assessment tool for problem behaviors is predetermined.”
BackgroundMethodOh, G., Song, J., Park, H., & Na, C. (2021) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2021.1953360 · Cited by 19
D’Alessio, S. J., Stolzenberg, L., & Eitle, D. J. (2013) · American Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1007/s12103-013-9199-1 · Cited by 19
Detecting Gunshots Using Wearable Accelerometers
Loeffler, C. E. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106664 · Cited by 18
Huey, L. (2016) · Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being · doi:10.35502/jcswb.15 · Cited by 20
An Introduction to Statistical Learning from a Regression Perspective
Berk, R. A. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77650-7_34 · Cited by 17
“8 Table 1 raises several other important issues, but they are beyond the scope of this review (see Berk et al., forthcoming ).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAriel, B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278423.022 · Cited by 17
The Influence of Criminal History on the Likelihood of Committing Lethal Versus Nonlethal Violence
Ganpat, S. M., Liem, M. C. A., van der Leun, J., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2012) · Homicide Studies · doi:10.1177/1088767912466082 · Cited by 17
Harm-focused offender triage and prioritization: a Philadelphia case study
Ratcliffe, J., & Kikuchi, G. (2019) · Policing: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/pijpsm-08-2018-0118 · Cited by 15
“The use of an inductive random-forest approach based on a training data set of 30,000 cases by Berk et al. (2009) attracted considerable attention, and while the benefits of an actuarial approach were promoted in preference to the existing clinical model, the challenges were certainly not glossed…”
A machine learning analysis of misconduct in the New York Police Department
Cubitt, T. I. C., & Birch, P. (2021) · Policing An International Journal · doi:10.1108/pijpsm-11-2020-0178 · Cited by 15
Identifying high‐risk firearm owners to prevent mass violence
Laqueur, H. S., & Wintemute, G. J. (2019) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12477 · Cited by 15
“…have been applied to contexts ranging from credit card fraud detection (Aleskerov, Freisleben, & Rao, 1997; Patidar & Sharma, 2011) to disease diagnosis (Karabatak & Ince, 2009; Klöppel et al., 2012) to criminal justice settings such as predicting homicide risk among parolees (Berk et al., 2009).”
On LPG usage in rural Vietnamese households
Vahlne, N. (2016) · Development Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.deveng.2016.12.003 · Cited by 15
“A downside in using a non-parametric model include the interpretation of partial dependencies which cannot be interpreted in any causative or absolute way, but only as descriptive (Berk et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInvestigations: What Could, and Should, Be Taught?
Carson, D. (2013) · The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles · doi:10.1350/pojo.2013.86.3.628 · Cited by 16
“…domestic homicides), and the greater probability of certain people committing particular offences, perhaps more sociological methods should be adopted (e.g. Berk et al., 2009), and the standpoint, for a criminal investigation, should be extended to include an explanation as well as description.”
Forecasting and Criminal Justice Policy and Practice
Sabol, W. J., & Baumann, M. L. (2022) · American Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1007/s12103-022-09715-3 · Cited by 18
The recidivism of homicide offenders in Western Australia
Broadhurst, R., Maller, R., Maller, M., & Bouhours, B. (2018) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/0004865817722393 · Cited by 14
Citizen Security: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence
Abizanda, B., Hoffman, J. S., Marmolejo, L., & Duryea, S. (2012) · doi:10.18235/0006935 · Cited by 14
Algorithmic Decision Making in the Presence of Unmeasured ConfoundingPreprint
Jung, J., Shroff, R., Feller, A., & Goel, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.01868 · Cited by 20
“…randomized controlled trial, the Philadelphia Adult Probation and Parole Department evaluated the effectiveness of a risk assessment tool developed by Berk et al. (2009), and found the tool reduced the burden on parolees without significantly increasing rates of reoffense (Ahlman and Kurtz, 2009).”
MethodGill, C. E. (2010) · Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 13
Marciniak, D. (2022) · Policing & Society · doi:10.1080/10439463.2022.2144305 · Cited by 18
Berk, R. A. (2009) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00597.x · Cited by 12
Self-citationDevelopment of Aggression Detection Technique in Social Media
Zaib, S., Asif, M., & Arooj, M. (2019) · International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science · doi:10.5815/ijitcs.2019.05.05 · Cited by 11
“It is becoming popular to identify and predict the criminal activities which can help to avoid the crimes[8] .”
BackgroundSherman, L. W. (2012) · doi:10.18235/0009044 · Cited by 11
Self-citationA predictive model for serious police misconduct by variation of the theory of planned behaviour
Cubitt, T. I. C., Wooden, K., Kruger, E., & Kennedy, M. (2020) · Journal of Forensic Practice · doi:10.1108/jfp-08-2020-0033 · Cited by 10
Machine Learning Can Predict Shooting Victimization Well Enough to Help Prevent It
Heller, S., Jakubowski, B., Jelveh, Z., & Kapustin, M. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w30170 · Cited by 9
Predicting and Preventing Gun Violence: An Experimental Evaluation of READI ChicagoPreprint
Bhatt, M., Heller, S., Kapustin, M., Bertrand, M., & Blattman, C. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/dks29 · Cited by 10
Using machine learning to forecast domestic homicide via police data and super learning
Verrey, J., Ariel, B., Harinam, V., & Dillon, L. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50274-2 · Cited by 16
Studying Parole in the “Spotlight”: Lessons from a Large American Jurisdiction
Vîlcică, E. R. (2015) · European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10610-015-9284-8 · Cited by 9
Machine learning for policing: a case study on arrests in Chile
Wout, E. V. ’., Pieringer, C., Irribarra, D. T., Asahi, K., & Larroulet, P. (2020) · Policing & Society · doi:10.1080/10439463.2020.1779270 · Cited by 9
“…ff erent databases, model designs, and study objectives, the performance of the forecasting techniques is superior to many of the technologies reported in the literature, e.g. Berk et al. (2006, 2009, 2016), Berk (2019), Neuilly et al. (2011), Kim and Duwe (2016), Zeng et al. (2017), among others.”
MethodRobette, N. (2022) · Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique · doi:10.1177/07591063221128325 · Cited by 8
“At present, social scientists have made little use of these methods, and mainly with prediction objectives (see for instance Berk et al., 2006; Berk et al., 2009; Compton, 2019; McKay, 2019; Rigobon et al., 2019), although more substantive uses exist (for example Berk et al., 2005).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Berk, R., Sherman, L., Barnes, G., Kurtz, E., & Ahlman, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- First Judicial District of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , USA
- Corresponding author
- Berk, Richard
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07-24
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 191-211
- ISSN
- 0964-1998 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-985X
- OpenAlex
- W2038763866
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 24.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (SES-0437169)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- probationers, parolees, recidivism, statistical learning, community supervision, sentencing guidelines, resource allocation, Philadelphia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review