The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Meta‐analysis of Hemodynamic Studies on First and Second Language Processing: Which Suggested Differences Can We Trust and What Do They Mean?
Open accessAbstract
This article presents the results of a meta‐analysis of 30 hemodynamic experiments comparing first language (L1) and second language (L2) processing in a range of tasks. The results suggest that reliably stronger activation during L2 processing is found (a) only for task‐specific subgroups of L2 speakers and (b) within some, but not all regions that are also typically activated in native language processing. A tentative interpretation based on the functional roles of frontal and temporal regions is suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers
Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.070039597 · Cited by 3,225
Changes in grey matter induced by training
Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/427311a · Cited by 2,373
Structural plasticity in the bilingual brain
Mechelli, A., Crinion, J. T., Noppeney, U., O'Doherty, J., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S., & Price, C. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/431757a · Cited by 1,005
The neural substrates underlying word generation: A bilingual functional-imaging study
Klein, D., Milner, B., Zatorre, R. J., Meyer, E., & Evans, A. C. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.7.2899 · Cited by 457
Cited by
The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis
Li, S. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x · Cited by 941
Neuroplasticity as a function of second language learning: Anatomical changes in the human brain
Li, P., Legault, J., & Litcofsky, K. A. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.05.001 · Cited by 458
How native-like is non-native language processing?
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.002 · Cited by 395
L1 and L2 processing in the bilingual brain: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies
Liu, H., & Cao, F. (2016) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.013 · Cited by 178
Neural bases of language switching in high and early proficient bilinguals
Garbin, G., Costa, A., Sanjuan, A., Forn, C., Rodriguez-Pujadas, A., Ventura, N., Belloch, V., Hernandez, M., & Ávila, C. (2011) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.03.011 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Indefrey, P.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 279-304
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W1517832976
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Meta‐analysis of Hemodynamic Studies on First and Second Language Processing: Which Suggested Differences Can We Trust and What Do They Mean? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00365.x
- The paper
- Indefrey, P. (2006). A Meta‐analysis of Hemodynamic Studies on First and Second Language Processing: Which Suggested Differences Can We Trust and What Do They Mean? Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00365.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
