The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Responses to Recasts: Repetitions, Primed Production, and Linguistic Development
Abstract
Although a number of studies have associated recasts with second language development, the actual mechanisms by which recasts work to impact learning are still little understood. In particular, researchers have sought to gain a deeper understanding of the connections among recasts, learners' responses to recasts, and subsequent development. To this end, the current study examines the impact of recasts and different types of responses on English as a second language (ESL) question development. In a pretest/posttest design, 58 Thai English as a foreign language university students carried out a series of communicative tasks with native English speakers and completed four tests over a 9‐week period. The learners' treatment task data were analyzed for the occurrence of recasts and responses to recasts that targeted developmentally advanced question forms. Their test data were examined for evidence of advancement to a higher stage in the developmental sequence for question formation. Results indicate that recasts were a significant predictor of ESL question development. Learners' responses in the form of primed production of the question forms targeted in the recasts were also predictive of ESL question development, but responses in the form of immediate repetitions of recasts were not associated with development.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Immediate repetition was not.”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as McDonough and Mackey (2006)
In the citing paper
“They found that what they called 'primed repetition' of the recasts (i.e.repetition that did not take place immediately following the recasts but within six turns) was associated with L2 development.”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as McDonough and Mackey (2006)
In the citing paper
“However, it could be argued that the 'primed repetition' in this study was closer to an immediate than a delayed response.”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as McDonough and Mackey (2006)
Citations
Cites
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034 · Cited by 2,629
(1998) · Cited by 2,572
Syntactic persistence in language production
Bock, J. K. (1986) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 · Cited by 1,911
THE ROBUSTNESS OF CRITICAL PERIOD EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100004022 · Cited by 1,432
IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND THE ACQUISITION OF L2 GRAMMAR
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263106060141 · Cited by 1,076
The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning?
Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177 · Cited by 950
Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development: Recasts, Responses, and Red Herrings?
Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x · Cited by 870
Self-citationDIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF PROMPTS AND RECASTS IN FORM-FOCUSED INSTRUCTION
Lyster, R. (2004) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263104263021 · Cited by 826
INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT: An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL
Mackey, A. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199004027 · Cited by 772
Self-citationLyster, R. (1998) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00039 · Cited by 694
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1037/0003-066X.45.11.1221 · DOI
- Ford C., 1997, Bright ideas: ESL activities for all ages
- Long M. H., 2006, Problems in SLA
- Mackey A., 1994, Using communicative tasks to target grammatical structures: A handbook of tasks and instructions for their use
- Mackey A., 1999, Communicative tasks: Thai
- Maggs P., 2002, Timesaver speaking activities
- McDonough K., Interactional feedback and second language acquisition: Empirical research
- Ohta A., 2000, The construction of second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction, 47
- Soars J., 1986, Headway intermediate
- Zaorob M., 2001, Games for grammar practice
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ORAL FEEDBACK IN CLASSROOM SLA: A Meta-Analysis
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990520 · Cited by 838
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000365 · Cited by 741
Feedback, Noticing and Instructed Second Language Learning
Mackey, A. (2006) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ami051 · Cited by 536
Self-citationGass, S. M., Behney, J., Plonsky, L., Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410604651 · Cited by 549
Ellis, R. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990544 · Cited by 479
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonough, K., & Mackey, A.
- Affiliations
- Northern Arizona University (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McDonough, Kim
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-03
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 693-720
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2057975136
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 70.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Learning (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- recasts, second language acquisition, question formation, repetition, student response, English as a second language, Thai learners of English, developmental sequence, communicative tasks, native speaker interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review