The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teaching L2 Learners How to Listen Does Make a Difference: An Empirical Study
Open accessAbstract
This study investigated the effects of a metacognitive, process‐based approach to teaching second language (L2) listening over a semester. Participants (N = 106) came from six intact sections of French as a second language (FSL) courses. The experimental group (n = 59) listened to texts using a methodology that led learners through the metacognitive processes (prediction/planning, monitoring, evaluating, and problem solving) underlying successful L2 listening. The control group (n = 47), taught by the same teacher, listened to the same texts the same number of times but without any guided attention to process. Development of metacognition about L2 listening, tracked using the Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ), was measured at the beginning, middle, and end points of the study. As hypothesized, the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group on the final comprehension measure, after we controlled for initial differences. The hypothesis that the less skilled listeners in the experimental group would make greater gains than their more skilled peers was also verified. Transcript data from stimulated‐recall sessions provide further evidence of a growing learner awareness of the metacognitive processes underlying successful L2 listening, as MALQ student responses changed over the duration of the study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282
Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524490 · Cited by 2,771
Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0 · Cited by 2,023
Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement
(1989) · Springer Series in Cognitive Development · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4 · Cited by 1,881
Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice
Grabe, W. (2008) · Cited by 1,639
SPSS for intermediate statistics : use and interpretation
Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., Morgan, G. A., Clay, J. N., & Quick, D. (2005) · Cited by 1,569
Individual Differences in Second Language Learning
Skehan, P. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315831664 · Cited by 1,518
Design and analysis of ecological experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1994) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90324-7 · Cited by 1,312
Comprehension instruction : research-based best practices
Block, C. C., & Pressley, M. G. (2002) · Cited by 956
Cited by
The Effectiveness of Second Language Strategy Instruction: A Meta‐analysis
Plonsky, L. (2011) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00663.x · Cited by 379
Learner Variables in Second Language Listening Comprehension: An Exploratory Path Analysis
Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12105 · Cited by 253
Self-citationSato, M., & Loewen, S. (2018) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12283 · Cited by 195
Wang, Y., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2017) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.12.013 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-05-13
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 470-497
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W1875204997
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 164.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teaching L2 Learners How to Listen Does Make a Difference: An Empirical Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x
- The paper
- Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 Learners How to Listen Does Make a Difference: An Empirical Study. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.