The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Verb‐Noun Collocations in Second Language Writing: A Corpus Analysis of Learners’ English
Abstract
The present study investigates the use of English verb‐noun collocations in the writing of native speakers of Hebrew at three proficiency levels. For this purpose, we compiled a learner corpus that consists of about 300,000 words of argumentative and descriptive essays. For comparison purposes, we selected LOCNESS, a corpus of young adult native speakers of English. We retrieved the 220 most frequently occurring nouns in the LOCNESS corpus and in the learner corpus, created concordances for them, and extracted verb‐noun collocations. Subsequently, we performed two types of comparisons: learners were compared with native speakers on the frequency of collocation use and learners were compared with other learners of different second‐language proficiencies on the frequency and correctness of collocations. The data revealed that learners at all three proficiency levels produced far fewer collocations than native speakers, that the number of collocations increased only at the advanced level, and that errors, particularly interlingual ones, continued to persist even at advanced levels of proficiency. We discuss the results in light of the nature of collocations and communicative learning and suggest some pedagogical implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning Vocabulary in Another Language
Nation, I. S. P. (2001) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524759 · Cited by 6,608
A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning
Garcia, P., & Skehan, P. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587891 · Cited by 3,507
Corpus, Concordance, Collocation
Green, P. N. (1992) · Cited by 3,465
Selinker, L. (1972) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209 · Cited by 2,962
Formulaic Language and the Lexicon
Wray, A. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511519772 · Cited by 2,873
Focus on Form: A Design Feature in Language Teaching Methodology
Long, M. (1991) · Studies in Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.2.07lon · Cited by 1,775
If you look at …: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks
Biber, D. (2004) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/25.3.371 · Cited by 1,539
Stewart, E. C. (1982) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0388-0001(82)80008-9 · Cited by 1,248
Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/026553220101800103 · Cited by 1,211
Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book
McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y. (2006) · Cited by 1,172
Cited by
The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research
Paquot, M. (2019) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658317694221 · Cited by 175
An A–Z of Applied Linguistics Research Methods
Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2016) · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-40322-3 · Cited by 156
Gauging the association of EFL learners’ writing proficiency and their use of metaphorical language
Hoang, H., & Boers, F. (2018) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.02.004 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Laufer, B., & Waldman, T.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-20
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 647-672
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W1509398963
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 58.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Verb‐Noun Collocations in Second Language Writing: A Corpus Analysis of Learners’ English. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00621.x
- The paper
- Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb‐Noun Collocations in Second Language Writing: A Corpus Analysis of Learners’ English. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00621.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.