The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SLA for the 21st Century: Disciplinary Progress, Transdisciplinary Relevance, and the Bi/multilingual Turn
Abstract
The goals of this article are to appraise second language acquisition's (SLA) disciplinary progress over the last 15 years and to reflect on transdisciplinary relevance as the field has completed 40 years of existence and moves forward into the 21st century. I first identify four trends that demonstrate vibrant disciplinary progress in SLA. I then turn to the notion of transdisciplinarity, or the proclivity to pursue and generate SLA knowledge that can be of use outside the confines of the field and contribute to overall knowledge about the human capacity for language. I propose an understanding of transdisciplinary relevance for SLA that results from the ability: (a) to place one's field in a wider landscape of disciplines that share an overarching common goal and (b) to develop critical awareness of one's disciplinary framings of object of inquiry and goals and others’ likely reception of them. Finally, I argue that it is by reframing SLA as the study of late bi/multilingualism that the remarkable progress witnessed in the last 15 years will help the field reach new levels of transdisciplinary relevance as a contributor to the study of the ontogeny of human language and a source of knowledge in support of language education in the 21st century.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequencing in SLA: Phonological Memory, Chunking, and Points of Order
Ellis, N. C. (1996) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100014698 · Cited by 837
Age, rate, and eventual attainment in second language acquisition
Krashen, S. D., Long, M. A., & Scarcella, R. C. (1979) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586451 · Cited by 581
An anatomical signature for literacy
Carreiras, M., Seghier, M. L., Baquero, S., Estévez, A., Lozano, A., Devlin, J. T., & Price, C. J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08461 · Cited by 512
THE EVOLVING CONTEXT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE HYPOTHESIS
Bley-Vroman, R. (2009) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109090275 · Cited by 335 · cited 2×
“This trend has been in response to the realization that knowledge of the L2 must be studied vis-à-vis processing effects (Bley-Vroman, 2009), a theoretical necessity also recognized by Chomsky (e.”
Result
Cited by
The Acquisition of Heritage Languages
Montrul, S. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139030502 · Cited by 900
AI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing Assistance Tools
Alharbi, W. (2023) · Education Research International · doi:10.1155/2023/4253331 · Cited by 286
LEUNG, C., & VALDÉS, G. (2019) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12568 · Cited by 205
Schissel, J. L., De Korne, H., & López-Gopar, M. (2021) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2018.1463965 · Cited by 123
Saito, K. (2020) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12387 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Ortega, L.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-13
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W1889709078
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 177.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SLA for the 21st Century: Disciplinary Progress, Transdisciplinary Relevance, and the Bi/multilingual Turn. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00735.x
- The paper
- Ortega, L. (2013). SLA for the 21st Century: Disciplinary Progress, Transdisciplinary Relevance, and the Bi/multilingual Turn. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00735.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.