The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On Defining Communicative Intentions
Open accessAbstract
See e.g.Bach & Harnish (1979) and Sperber & Wilson (1986).This should be qualified in view of the problem raised by the existence of 'institutional' or 'conventional' illocutionary acts.Only ordinary, non-conventional illocutionary acts are commonly assumed to be definable in Gricean terms.Following Grice, I use 'utterance' as a neutral word to apply to any candidate for the status of communicative behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Grice, H. P. (1957) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2182440 · Cited by 2,824
Cited by
Paul Grice and the philosophy of language
Neale, S. (1992) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/bf00630629 · Cited by 578
Illocutionary Acts and Attitude Expression
Siebel, M. (2003) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1023/a:1024110814662 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- RECANATI, F.
- Venue
- Mind & Language
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-09
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 213-241
- ISSN
- 0268-1064 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0017
- OpenAlex
- W1966004192
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Defining Communicative Intentions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1986.tb00102.x
- The paper
- RECANATI, F. (1986). On Defining Communicative Intentions. Mind & Language. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1986.tb00102.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
