Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Women, information technology and ‘waves of optimism’: Australian evidence on ‘mixed‐skill’ jobs

Roan, Amanda, Whitehouse, Gillian·2007·New Technology, Work and Employment

Abstract

Optimism about the increased engagement of women in information technology employment has been informed, in part, by essentialist ideas about the suitability for women of emerging jobs combining technical with interpersonal, artistic or other ‘non‐technical’ skills. Drawing on evidence from Australia, we highlight limitations to this brand of optimism, questioning the potential for women in mixed‐skill jobs in computing and multimedia organisations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-005x.2007.00181.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1111/1468-0432.00027 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/978-1-349-26346-2_8 · DOI
  3. Butler J., 1991, Gender Trouble—Feminism and the Subversion of Identity
  4. 10.4135/9781446250204.n2 · DOI
  5. Cassell J., 1998, From Barbie to Mortal Combat, 10.7551/mitpress/3125.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cockburn C., 1985, Machinery of Dominance: Men, Women and Technical Know‐How
  7. Cunningham S., 2003, Smart State Is Also Creative State: Opportunities for Queensland in the Creative Industries, Queensland Review, 10, 29, 10.1017/S1321816600002506 · DOI
  8. Darr A., 2004, The Skills That Matter, 55, 10.1007/978-0-230-21189-6_4 · DOI
  9. Deakin R., 1984, Women and Computing: The Golden Opportunity
  10. Greenbaum J., 2000, Deadlines and Work Practices in New Media Development: It's about Time, Its about Participatory Design Conference
  11. Greenhill A. L.Von Hellens S.NielsenandR.Pringle(1996) ‘Larrikin Cultures and Women in IT Education’ Proceedings of the 19th Information Research seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS 19) Sweden.
  12. Grundy F., 1996, Women and Computers
  13. Haraway D., 1985, A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s, Socialist Review, 80, 65
  14. Hearn G., 1998, The Communication Superhighway—Social and Economic Change in the Digital Age
  15. Margolis J., 2002, Unlocking the Clubhouse—Women in Computing
  16. Moi T., 2000, What Is a Woman?
  17. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000326 · DOI
  18. 10.1057/fr.1980.20 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Plant S., 1997, Zeros + Ones: Digital Women + the New Technoculture
  20. 10.1146/annurev.so.19.080193.001325 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1108/09593840410554201 · DOI
  22. 10.1108/09593840210430552 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Turkle S., 1996, Life on the Screen. Identity in the Age of the Internet
  24. Wajcman J., 1991, Feminism Confronts Technology
  25. Wajcman J., 2004, Technofeminism
  26. Webster J., 1996, Shaping Women's Work: Gender, Employment and Information Technology
  27. Whitehouse G., 2005, “Hybrids” and the Gendering of Computing Jobs in Australia, Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 79, 10.3127/ajis.v12i2.94 · DOI
  28. 10.1017/CBO9780511488948 · DOI
  29. 10.1108/09593840210430561 · DOI
  30. Wright R., 1996, Masculinities in Organisations, 77

Cited by

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Roan, A., & Whitehouse, G.
Venue
New Technology, Work and Employment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
21-33
ISSN
  • 0268-1072
  • 1468-005X
Cited by
23
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.