The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pre‐Industrial Inequality
Abstract
Is inequality largely the result of the Industrial Revolution? Or, were pre‐industrial incomes as unequal as they are today? This article infers inequality across individuals within each of the 28 pre‐industrial societies, for which data were available, using what are known as social tables. It applies two new concepts: the inequality possibility frontier and the inequality extraction ratio. They compare the observed income inequality to the maximum feasible inequality that, at a given level of income, might have been ‘extracted’ by those in power. The results give new insights into the connection between inequality and economic development in the very long run.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1369 · Cited by 8,517
Economic Growth and Income Inequality
Kuznets, S. (2019) · The Gap between Rich and Poor · doi:10.4324/9780429311208-4 · Cited by 8,064
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.6.3077 · Cited by 6,047
Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998
Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/00335530360535135 · Cited by 3,769
A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality
Deininger, K., & Squire, L. (1996) · The World Bank Economic Review · doi:10.1093/wber/10.3.565 · Cited by 3,049
The world economy: a millennial perspective
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-1061 · Cited by 1,891
History Lessons: Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World
Sokoloff, K. L., & Engerman, S. L. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.217 · Cited by 1,702
The world economy: historical statistics
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-4407 · Cited by 1,442
The World Economy: Historical Statistics
Maddison, A. (2003) · Development Centre Studies · doi:10.1787/9789264104143-en · Cited by 1,185
The Estimation of the Lorenz Curve and Gini Index
Gastwirth, J. L. (1972) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1937992 · Cited by 1,132
Cited by
Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule
HAGGARD, S., & KAUFMAN, R. R. (2012) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000287 · Cited by 300
“Why Is Labor Receiving a Smaller Share of Global Income? Theory and Empirical Evidence”
Dao, M., Das, M., Koczan, Z., & Lian, W. (2017) · IMF Working Papers · doi:10.5089/9781484311042.001 · Cited by 144
(2020) · doi:10.1093/restud/rdaa075 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Milanovic, B., Lindert, P. H., & Williamson, J. G.
- Venue
- The Economic Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-11-23
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 551
- Pages
- 255-272
- ISSN
- 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0297
- OpenAlex
- W2168134172
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 53.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pre‐Industrial Inequality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02403.x
- The paper
- Milanovic, B., Lindert, P. H., & Williamson, J. G. (2011). Pre‐Industrial Inequality. The Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02403.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.