The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS task force
Open accessAbstract
Disorders of language, spatial perception, attention, memory, calculation and praxis are a frequent consequence of acquired brain damage [in particular, stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI)] and a major determinant of disability. The rehabilitation of aphasia and, more recently, of other cognitive disorders is an important area of neurological rehabilitation. We report here a review of the available evidence about effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation. Given the limited number and generally low quality of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in this area of therapeutic intervention, the Task Force considered, besides the available Cochrane reviews, evidence of lower classes which was critically analysed until a consensus was reached. In particular, we considered evidence from small group or single cases studies including an appropriate statistical evaluation of effect sizes. The general conclusion is that there is evidence to award a grade A, B or C recommendation to some forms of cognitive rehabilitation in patients with neuropsychological deficits in the post‐acute stage after a focal brain lesion (stroke, TBI). These include aphasia therapy, rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect (ULN), attentional training in the post‐acute stage after TBI, the use of electronic memory aids in memory disorders, and the treatment of apraxia with compensatory strategies. There is clearly a need for adequately designed studies in this area, which should take into account specific problems such as patient heterogeneity and treatment standardization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke
Brady, M. C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., Enderby, P., & Campbell, P. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000425.pub4 · Cited by 1,159
Intensity of Aphasia Therapy, Impact on Recovery
Bhogal, S. K., Teasell, R., & Speechley, M. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000062343.64383.d0 · Cited by 719
Constraint-Induced Therapy of Chronic Aphasia After Stroke
Pulvermüller, F., Neininger, B., Elbert, T., Mohr, B., Rockstroh, B., Koebbel, P., & Taub, E. (2001) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.32.7.1621 · Cited by 683
The efficacy of group communication treatment in adults with chronic aphasia
Elman, R. J., & Bernstein-Ellis, E. (1999) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jslhr.4202.411 · Cited by 302
The efficacy of computer-provided reading treatment for chronic aphasic adults
Katz, R. C., & Wertz, R. T. (1997) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jslhr.4003.493 · Cited by 240
Review: single-subject clinical-outcome research: designs, data, effect sizes, and analyses
ROBEY, R. R., SCHULTZ, M. C., CRAWFORD, A. B., & SINNER, C. A. (1999) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/026870399402028 · Cited by 194
Doesborgh, S. J. C., van de Sandt-Koenderman, M. W. E., Dippel, D. W. J., van Harskamp, F., Koudstaal, P. J., & Visch-Brink, E. G. (2004) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000105460.52928.a6 · Cited by 126
Cited by
Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., Bates, B., Cherney, L. R., Cramer, S. C., Deruyter, F., Eng, J. J., Fisher, B., Harvey, R. L., et al. (2016) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000098 · Cited by 3,293
Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Updated Review of the Literature From 1998 Through 2002
Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J. F., Langenbahn, D. M., Felicetti, T., Kneipp, S., Ellmo, W., Kalmar, K., Giacino, J. T., Harley, J. P., et al. (2005) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024 · Cited by 1,140
Cognitive rehabilitation for attention deficits following stroke
Loetscher, T., Potter, K.-J., Wong, D., & das Nair, R. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002842.pub3 · Cited by 131
Cotelli, M., Manenti, R., Ferrari, C., Gobbi, E., Macis, A., & Cappa, S. F. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.12.003 · Cited by 108
Self-citationINCOG Recommendations for Management of Cognition Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part V: Memory
Velikonja, D., Tate, R., Ponsford, J., McIntyre, A., Janzen, S., & Bayley, M. (2014) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000069 · Cited by 117
Cotelli, M., Manenti, R., Brambilla, M., Gobbi, E., Ferrari, C., Binetti, G., & Cappa, S. F. (2019) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x17740390 · Cited by 112
Self-citationElliott, M., & Parente, F. (2014) · Brain Injury · doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.934921 · Cited by 74
(2013) · Handbook of Clinical Neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52901-5.00027-7 · Cited by 58
Worthington, A. (2016) · NeuroRehabilitation · doi:10.3233/nre-161348 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Members of the Task Force on Cognitive Rehabilitation, Cappa, S. F., Benke, T., Clarke, S., Rossi, B., Stemmer, B., & van Heugten, C. M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-26
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 665-680
- ISSN
- 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-1331
- OpenAlex
- W2142300910
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 16.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
