The DOI matches its Crossref record; 187 of the 187 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance Measurement: Challenges for Tomorrow*
Open accessAbstract
This paper demonstrates that the context within which performance measurement is used is changing. The key questions posed are: Is performance measurement ready for the emerging context? What are the gaps in our knowledge? and Which lines of enquiry do we need to pursue? A literature synthesis conducted by a team of multidisciplinary researchers charts the evolution of the performance‐measurement literature and identifies that the literature largely follows the emerging business and global trends. The ensuing discussion introduces the currently emerging and predicted future trends and explores how current knowledge on performance measurement may deal with the emerging context. This results in identification of specific challenges for performance measurement within a holistic systems‐based framework. The principle limitation of the paper is that it covers a broad literature base without in‐depth analysis of a particular aspect of performance measurement. However, this weakness is also the strength of the paper. What is perhaps most significant is that there is a need for rethinking how we research the field of performance measurement by taking a holistic systems‐based approach, recognizing the integrated and concurrent nature of challenges that the practitioners, and consequently the field, face.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1999) · Cited by 28,356
Armstrong, J. S., & Georgoff, D. M. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90019-2 · Cited by 17,894
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
The balanced scorecard : measures that drive performance
Caplan, R. S. (1992) · Harvard business review · Cited by 12,085
Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3997 · Cited by 9,014
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
Morgan, D. (1997) · doi:10.4135/9781412984287 · Cited by 8,863
The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action
(1997) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(97)80925-9 · Cited by 8,192
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 7,979
The Principles of Scientific Management.
Woolf, L. S., Taylor, F. W., Scott, W. D., & Goldmark, J. (1912) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2221959 · Cited by 5,256
Cited by
Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12102 · Cited by 995
Is performance measurement and management fit for the future?
Melnyk, S. A., Bititci, U., Platts, K., Tobias, J., & Andersen, B. (2014) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.007 · Cited by 494
Self-citationCuccurullo, C., Aria, M., & Sarto, F. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1948-8 · Cited by 365
Nigri, G., & Del Baldo, M. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10124499 · Cited by 144
Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Barani, O., & Jusoh, R. (2021) · Journal of Management Control · doi:10.1007/s00187-021-00317-4 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., & Nudurupati, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06-24
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 305-327
- ISSN
- 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2370
- OpenAlex
- W1777668848
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 187
- FWCI
- 40.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance Measurement: Challenges for Tomorrow*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00318.x
- The paper
- Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., & Nudurupati, S. (2012). Performance Measurement: Challenges for Tomorrow*. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00318.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.