Cited by 72Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

The role of the family in institutional long‐term care: cultural management of filial piety in China

Zhan, Heying Jenny, Feng, Zhanlian, Chen, Zhiyu, Feng, Xiaotian·2011·International Journal of Social Welfare

Abstract

Zhan HJ, The role of the family in institutional long‐term care – cultural management of filial piety in China Int J Soc Welfare 2011: 20: S121–S134 © 2011 The Author(s), International Journal of Social Welfare © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare. This study used both qualitative and quantitative data collected in Nanjing, China, from 2008 to 2009, to examine the role of the family in long‐term institutional elder care. The qualitative data reported on four separate groups of family members and their elderly parents residing in institutions. The survey included information from 140 elder care institutions (over 95% of all urban elder care institutions) in Nanjing. The quantitative data provided a background from which to understand the qualitative responses of family members obtained during the focus group discussions. The qualitative data added a contextualized understanding of the reasons for institutional placement and aspects of the families' continued involvement in long‐term care. In conclusion, Chinese families, unlike families in the West, are currently struggling to manage the cultural demands of elder care together with the usual financial, caregiving, and emotional concerns. Managing stigma has been one of the adult children's prevalent themes in the transition from familial to institutional care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00808.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The younger generation faces pressure to manage the cultural demands of elder care, together with financial, caregiving, and emotional concerns, especially when all the burden falls on a single child.

    “At the same time, the younger generation also faces pressure to manage the cultural demands of elder care, together with the usual financial, caregiving, and emotional concerns, especially when all the burden falls on a single child (Zhan et al. 2011).”

    From The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy (2021) · cites this paper as Zhan et al. 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhan, H. J., Feng, Z., Chen, Z., & Feng, X.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Nanjing University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhan, Heying Jenny
Venue
International Journal of Social Welfare
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-26
Volume
20
Issue
s1
ISSN
  • 0907-2055 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-6866
  • 1468-2397
OpenAlex
W1529680133
Cited by
72
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Social Welfare (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fogarty International Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
long-term care facilities, filial piety, Chinese family, stigma, adult children, Nanjing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review