Cited by 16Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesNursing care and researchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Stressors and coping strategies in Chinese family caregivers of people with dementia in long-term care facilities: A qualitative descriptive study

Hui, Zhaozhao, Yang, Chen, Fan Lee, Diana Tze·2022·Dementia

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the stressors along with coping strategies in Chinese family caregivers whose relative with dementia had been placed into a long-term care facility. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 17 Chinese family caregivers of institutionalised older adults with dementia, recruited via purposeful sampling. Information regarding stressors along with coping strategies was collected through face-to-face semi-structured individual interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and imported into MAXQDA 2018.2. Data were analysed with qualitative content analysis. FINDINGS: Three categories of stressors emerged: socioeconomic pressure, hassles arising from continuing caregiving and suboptimal care provided by the facility. In particular, the family caregivers' experienced tremendous pressure of negative comments from people around since long-term care placement was traditionally viewed as unfilial in Chinese societies. Various coping strategies were adopted by Chinese family caregivers to deal with the stressors; however, they were not always adaptive. IMPLICATIONS: Health care authorities and professionals should recognise family caregivers' stressors after long-term care placement of a relative with dementia with the consideration of the unique socio-cultural needs. Appropriate and effective interventions should be developed and implemented to facilitate family caregivers to cope with stressful situations after long-term care placement and further to safeguard their psychosocial well-being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14713012211066661

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hui, Z., Yang, C., & Fan Lee, D. T.
Affiliations
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Corresponding author
Hui, Zhaozhao
Venue
Dementia
Published
2022-02-08
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
957-971
ISSN
  • 1471-3012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2684
OpenAlex
W4210882250
Cited by
16
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
family caregivers, long-term care facilities, caregiver stressors, coping strategies, socio-economic pressures, stigma, institutionalized elderly, Chinese caregivers, caregiver well-being, quality of care
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, China, Dementia, Family, Humans, Long-Term Care, Caregivers, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review