Cited by 195Advancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryDermatology and Skin DiseasesSkin Protection and Aging

Location‐related differences in structure and function of the stratum corneum with special emphasis on those of the facial skin

Tagami, H.·2008·International Journal of Cosmetic Science

Abstract

Between the two different kinds of the skin covering the body, the glabrous skin is found only on the palmo-plantar surface because of its rather simple function to protect the underlying living tissue with its remarkably thick stratum corneum (SC) from strong external force and friction. Thus, its barrier function is extremely poor. In contrast, the hair-bearing skin covers almost all over the body surface regardless of the presence of long hair or vellus hair. In regard to its SC, many dermatologists and skin scientists think that it is too thin to show any site-specific differences, because the SC is just present as an efficient barrier membrane to protect our body from desiccation as well as against the invasion by external injurious agents. However, there are remarkable regional differences not only in the living skin tissue but also even in such thin SC reflecting the function of each anatomical location. These differences in the SC have been mostly disclosed with the advent of non-invasive biophysical instruments, particularly the one that enables us to measure transepidermal water loss (TEWL), the parameter of the SC barrier function, and the one that evaluates the hydration state of the skin surface, the parameter of the water-holding capacity of the SC that brings about softness and smoothness to the skin surface. These in vivo instrumental measurements of the SC have disclosed the presence of remarkable differences in the functional properties of the SC particularl…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00459.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, dosed substances are absorbed more readily around the face, which is considered to have thinner skin than the trunk and limbs, suggesting that absorption depends on skin thickness.

    “In humans, dosed substances are absorbed more readily around the face, which is considered to have thinner skin than that around the trunk and limbs, suggesting that it depends on the thickness of the skin50, 51.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tagami, H.
Affiliations
Tohoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Tagami, H.
Venue
International Journal of Cosmetic Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-11-05
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
413-434
ISSN
  • 0142-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2494
OpenAlex
W2074225908
Cited by
195
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cosmetic Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
stratum corneum, facial skin, transepidermal water loss, skin barrier function, skin hydration, corneocytes, eyelid skin, skin lipids, non-invasive skin measurement, glabrous skin
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Face, Histocytochemistry, Humans, Skin, Skin Absorption, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Water Loss, Insensible

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review