Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Allocating the U.S. Federal Budget to the States: The Impact of the President

Larcinese, Valentino, Rizzo, Leonzio, Testa, Cecilia·2006·The Journal of Politics

Abstract

This paper provides new evidence on the determinants of the U.S. federal budget allocation to the states. Departing from the existing literature that gives prominence to Congress, we carry on an empirical investigation on the impact of presidents during the period 1982–2000. Our findings suggest that federal budget allocation is affected by presidential politics. States that heavily supported the incumbent president in past presidential elections tend to receive more funds, while marginal and swing states are not rewarded. Party affiliation also matters since states whose governor belong to the same party of the president receive more federal funds, while states opposing the president's party in Congressional elections are penalized. These results show that presidents are engaged in tactical distribution of federal funds and also provide good evidence in support of partisan theories of budget allocation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00419.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1023/A:1017998621210 · doi:10.1023/a:1017998621210
  2. Atlas Cary M, 1995, American Economic Review, 85, 624
  3. 10.1111/0022-3816.00046 · doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00046
  4. Bond James R, 2004, Cottril
  5. Couch Jim F, 1998, Shugart II
  6. Cox Gary W, 1993, McCubbins
  7. Cummings Milton C, Democracy Under Pressure: An Introduction to the American Political System
  8. 10.1017/S0003055402004215 · doi:10.1017/s0003055402004215
  9. Dasgupta Sugato, Unpublished manuscript
  10. Presidential Influence in Congress
  11. Fenno Richard, Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
  12. Ferejohn John A, Pork Barrel Politics
  13. 10.1023/A:1017572515367 · doi:10.1023/a:1017572515367
  14. 10.2307/447193 · doi:10.2307/447193
  15. Horney James, 2000, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities(February), 1
  16. 10.1007/BF00210362 · doi:10.1007/bf00210362
  17. Kiewiet D. Roderick, 2002, Leviathan, 30, 115
  18. 10.1023/A:1018341713887 · doi:10.1023/a:1018341713887
  19. 10.2307/2111665 · doi:10.2307/2111665
  20. 10.1007/BF00140840 · doi:10.1007/bf00140840
  21. 10.2307/448442 · doi:10.2307/448442
  22. Plott Charles, 1968, American Economic Review, 58, 306
  23. 10.2307/447352 · doi:10.2307/447352
  24. Ritt Leornard G, 1976, Public Policy, 24, 469
  25. 10.2307/2111137 · doi:10.2307/2111137
  26. 10.2307/448143 · doi:10.2307/448143
  27. Schick Allan, Whose Budget?”In The Presidency and the Congress: A Shifting Balance of Power?Eds. W. S. Livingston, L. C. Dodd and R. L. Schott
  28. 10.2307/2129322 · doi:10.2307/2129322

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Larcinese, V., Rizzo, L., & Testa, C.
Venue
The Journal of Politics
Published
2006-05
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
447-456
ISSN
  • 0022-3816
  • 1468-2508
OpenAlex
W3122377919
Cited by
268
References
32
FWCI
174.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Allocating the U.S. Federal Budget to the States: The Impact of the President. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00419.x
The paper
Larcinese, V., Rizzo, L., & Testa, C. (2006). Allocating the U.S. Federal Budget to the States: The Impact of the President. The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00419.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.