The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics
Abstract
We examine what determines whether an interest group will receive favors in pork-barrel politics, using a model of majority voting with two competing parties. Each group's membership is heterogeneous in its ideological affinity for the parties. Individuals face a trade-off between party affinity and their own transfer receipts. The model is general enough to yield two often-discussed but competing theories as special cases. If the parties are equally effective in delivering transfers to any group, then the outcome of the process conforms to the "swing voter" theory: both parties woo the groups that are politically central, and most willing to switch their votes in response to economic favors. If groups have party affinities, and each party is more effective in delivering favors to its own support group, then we can get the "machine politics" outcome, where each party favors its core support group. We derive these results theoretically, and illustrate their operation in particular examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina
STOKES, S. C. (2005) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055405051683 · Cited by 1,586
Fajgelbaum, P. D., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P. J., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz036 · Cited by 1,030
Power and political institutions
Moe, T. M. (2005) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592705050176 · Cited by 550
Is Vote Buying Effective? Evidence from a Field Experiment in West Africa
Vicente, P. C. (2014) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12086 · Cited by 365
Buying, Expropriating, and Stealing Votes
Mares, I., & Young, L. (2016) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-060514-120923 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Dixit, A., & Londregan, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Politics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1132-1155
- ISSN
- 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2508
- OpenAlex
- W2132667021
- Cited by
- 1,506
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2960152
- The paper
- Dixit, A., & Londregan, J. (1996). The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics. The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.