The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fictionality and Perceived Realism in Experiencing Stories: A Model of Narrative Comprehension and Engagement
Abstract
This article offers a theoretical framework to explain circumstances under which perceptions of “unrealness” affect engagement in narratives and subsequent perceived realism judgments. A mental models approach to narrative processing forms the foundation of a model that integrates narrative comprehension and phenomenological experiences such as transportation and identification. Three types of unrealness are discussed: fictionality, external realism (match with external reality), and narrative realism (coherence within a story). We gather evidence that fictionality does not affect narrative processing. On the other hand, violations of external and narrative realism are conceived as inconsistencies among the viewer’s mental structures as they construct mental models of meaning to represent and comprehend the narrative. These inconsistencies may result in negative online evaluations of a narrative’s realism, may disrupt engagement, and may negatively influence postexposure (reflective) realism judgments as well as lessen a narrative’s persuasive power.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,259
Flow: the psychology of optimal experience
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0597 · Cited by 12,637
Bruner, J. (1986) · doi:10.4159/9780674029019 · Cited by 8,657
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Reid, L. A., & Polanyi, M. (1959) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119338 · Cited by 7,538
Actual Minds, Possible Worlds.
Mergler, N., Schleifer, R., & Bruner, J. (1986) · MLN · doi:10.2307/2905728 · Cited by 6,609
Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex
Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3 · Cited by 6,128
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Strategies of Discourse Comprehension
Staczek, J. J., van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1985) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/326517 · Cited by 5,395
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) · Cited by 5,190
The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 · Cited by 4,861
Cited by
Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences
Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1320645111 · Cited by 1,159
Measuring Narrative Engagement
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213260903287259 · Cited by 1,088
Self-citationBal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055341 · Cited by 588
Braddock, K., & Dillard, J. P. (2016) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555 · Cited by 568
Identification as a Mechanism of Narrative Persuasion
de Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, J. W. J. (2012) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650211408594 · Cited by 506
Metadata
- Authors
- Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H.
- Venue
- Communication Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 255-280
- ISSN
- 1050-3293 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2885
- OpenAlex
- W2093767824
- Cited by
- 745
- References
- 83
- FWCI
- 422.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fictionality and Perceived Realism in Experiencing Stories: A Model of Narrative Comprehension and Engagement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x
- The paper
- Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and Perceived Realism in Experiencing Stories: A Model of Narrative Comprehension and Engagement. Communication Theory. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
