Cited by 390Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionAttachment and Relationship DynamicsDigital Communication and Language

First Comes Love, Then Comes Google: An Investigation of Uncertainty Reduction Strategies and Self-Disclosure in Online Dating

Gibbs, Jennifer L., Ellison, Nicole B., Lai, Chih-Hui·2011·Communication Research

Abstract

This study investigates relationships between privacy concerns, uncertainty reduction behaviors, and self-disclosure among online dating participants, drawing on uncertainty reduction theory and the warranting principle. The authors propose a conceptual model integrating privacy concerns, self-efficacy, and Internet experience with uncertainty reduction strategies and amount of self-disclosure and then test this model on a nationwide sample of online dating participants ( N = 562). The study findings confirm that the frequency of use of uncertainty reduction strategies is predicted by three sets of online dating concerns—personal security, misrepresentation, and recognition—as well as self-efficacy in online dating. Furthermore, the frequency of uncertainty reduction strategies mediates the relationship between these variables and amount of self-disclosure with potential online dating partners. The authors explore the theoretical implications of these findings for our understanding of uncertainty reduction, warranting, and self-disclosure processes in online contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0093650210377091

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such a finding runs parallel with previous works where the self was manipulated and has become different because of too much enhancement.

    “Such a finding runs parallel with previous works where the self was manipulated and has become different because of too much enhancement (Gibbs et al., 2011; Hart et al., 2017; Levine & Feldman, 1997).”

    From Mobile Sexuality: Presentations of Young Filipinos in Dating Apps (2020) · cites this paper as Gibbs et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Lai, C.-H.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gibbs, Jennifer L.
Venue
Communication Research
Published
2010-12-14
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
70-100
ISSN
  • 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3810
OpenAlex
W2103933416
Cited by
390
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 9
FWCI
43.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communication Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
Keywords
online dating, uncertainty reduction, self-disclosure, privacy concerns, self-efficacy, online experience, personal security, misrepresentation, recognition, online relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review