Patients characteristics affecting physician–patient nonverbal communication
Abstract
Previous research has reported that nonverbal elements of physician-patient communication influence medical outcomes such as patients’ understanding, compliance, and saris/action with health care delivery. This investigation examined the impact of various patients’ characteristics (age, sex, education, anxiety, and relational history with the physician) on patterns of nonverbal communication exhibited in 41 physician-patient interactions at a family practice clinic. Several findings were noteworthy. First, although they were relatively consistent in their nonverbal responses to different patients, physicians generally reciprocated patient's adjustments in response latency, pauses during speaking turns, body orientation, and interruptions and compensated patient's modifications in turn duration and gestural rates. Second, physicians nonverbally interacted with patients over 30 years of age in a less domineering and more responsive fashion (e.g., comparable turn durations, more vocal back-channels, and more nonverbal behavior reciprocity) than they did when conversing with patients under 30. Third, physicians appeared responsive to patients experiencing various degrees of anxiety. Specifically, relative to their interactions with less worried patients, physicians used less task touch with anxious patients and to a greater degree compensated the worried patients nonverbal responses. Finally, the patients sex, education, and visit (i.e., first versus repeat) had little impact on…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Street and Buller found no differences in level of nonverbal communication towards patients of different educational backgrounds.
“No differences were found in the level of nonverbal communication towards patients of different educational backgrounds.”
From Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference? (2005) · cites this paper as [31]
When talking to higher educated patients, physicians reciprocated their body orientations more than with lower educated patients (p<0.001).
“However, when talking to higher educated patients the physicians reciprocated their body orientations more than they did with lower educated patients (p<0.001).”
From Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference? (2005) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
BERGER, C. R., & CALABRESE, R. J. (1975) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x · Cited by 3,006 · see citing works
Effect of postural congruence on client’s perception of counselor empathy.
Maurer, R. E., & Tindall, J. H. (1983) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.30.2.158 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference?
Willems, S., De Maesschalck, S., Deveugele, M., Derese, A., & De Maeseneer, J. (2005) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.02.011 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
The social gradient in doctor-patient communication
Verlinde, E., De Laender, N., De Maesschalck, S., Deveugele, M., & Willems, S. (2012) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-12 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Communicative styles and adaptations in physician–parent consultations
Street, R. L. (1992) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90289-3 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- STREET, R. L., & BULLER, D. B.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Venue
- Human Communication Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60-90
- ISSN
- 0360-3989 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2030068217
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 14.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Communication Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Keywords
- physician-patient communication, nonverbal communication, patient characteristics, age differences, patient anxiety, turn duration, body orientation, interruptions, reciprocity, general practice, patient education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review