Cited by 154Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling Practices and SupervisionEmpathy and Medical Education

Effect of postural congruence on client’s perception of counselor empathy.

Maurer, Richard E., Tindall, Jeffrey H.·1983·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of counselor postural congruence on client perception of the counselor's level of empathy. Specifically, it sought to determine whether a counselor who was mirror imaging a congruent arm and leg position of a client would significantly increase the client's perception of the counselor's level of empathy over the level of the client's perception when the counselor did not mirror image congruent arm and leg position. Eighty adolescents met individually with a counselor for 15 minutes to discuss career plans. Three variables were controlled for in this investigation: counselor's direct body orientation, position of counselor's head, and the empathy level of the counselor's verbal responses. The dependent variable was the Empathy subscale of the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory. In a 2 X 2 X 2 analysis of variance the results were, as predicted, that the clients would rate the counselor as having a significantly greater level of empathy in the congruent condition than in the noncongruent condition. Application to counselor training and suggestions for further research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0167.30.2.158

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Therapists are rated more favorably and as more empathic when they are instructed to make their movements more (rather than less) synchronized with the patient.

    “Consistent with this, several experiments that examined simulated psychotherapy sessions have shown that therapists are rated more favorably and as more empathic when they are instructed to make their movements more (rather than less) synchronized with the patient (Trout and Rosenfeld, 1980; Maurer and Tindall, 1983; Sharpley et al., 2001).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maurer, R. E., & Tindall, J. H.
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
1983-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
158-163
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W1993627390
Cited by
154
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
counselor empathy, consumer perception, mirror imaging, body language, counselor-client interaction, career guidance, adolescents, counselor education, Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review