The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decision Development in Small Groups IV A Typology of Group Decision Paths
Abstract
This study develops a typology of decision paths through analysis of 47 recorded decisions. The sample included a wide variety of decisions made by a variety of groups. Recent research has questioned the traditional assumption that all normal groups follow a set, unitary sequence of decision stages. Instead, this research suggests groups may follow multiple sequences in making decisions. Some writers have gone so far as to deny the existence of phases and propose alternative nonphasic formulations. This study sought to generate descriptive data that could help define the range of alternative decision paths and their properties, in the hope that this could help select among the three perspectives on group decision development. The study developed new methods for mapping developmental sequences that made it possible to avoid one of the most troubling problems in prior research—the use of arbitrary time segments to define phases. The resulting typology had 11 different decision paths that fell into three main groups: unitary sequences, complex sequences, and solution-centered sequences. Analysis of this typology supported the multiple sequence model, but also suggested a role for normative unitary models. The study also found that most groups have significant periods of disorganized activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developmental sequence in small groups.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022100 · Cited by 5,778
Cited by
Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP): A Theory of Groups
Mcgrath, J. E. (1991) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496491222001 · Cited by 1,019
The Negotiation Dance: Time, Culture, and Behavioral Sequences in Negotiation
Adair, W. L., & Brett, J. M. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0102 · Cited by 490
Aldag, R. J., & Fuller, S. R. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.533 · Cited by 306
Microlevel Structuration in Computer-Supported Group Decision Making
SCOTT, M., & DeSANCTIS, P. G. (1992) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00294.x · Cited by 299
Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes
Pentland, B. T. (1995) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.6.5.541 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- POOLE, M. S., & ROTH, J.
- Venue
- Human Communication Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 323-356
- ISSN
- 0360-3989 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2039717271
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision Development in Small Groups IV A Typology of Group Decision Paths. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00188.x
- The paper
- POOLE, M. S., & ROTH, J. (1989). Decision Development in Small Groups IV A Typology of Group Decision Paths. Human Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00188.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.