Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes
Abstract
Grammar has been used metaphorically to describe organizational processes, but the metaphor has never been systematically developed so that it can be applied in empirical research. This paper develops the grammatical metaphor into a rigorous model for describing and theorizing about organizational work processes, defined here as sequences of actions that occur in the context of enabling and constraining structures. A grammatical model starts with a lexicon of elementary actions (called moves) and specifies the ways in which they can be combined to create a process. Unlike other sequential data analysis techniques, grammatical models provide a natural way of describing the layering and nesting of actions that typifies organizational processes. The example of a simple retail sales transaction is used to illustrate the underlying concepts. The paper also examines some methodological considerations involved in using process grammars and proposes an agenda for research, including: (1) creating descriptive taxonomies of organizational processes; (2) creating disconfirmable theories about the relationship between processes and the structures that enable and constrain them; (3) explaining the distribution of observed processes and predicting new processes that have not yet been observed; and (4) designing new organizational processes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interdependence between actions can be viewed as part of structure, but it can also generate variety within specific performances.
“While interdependence between actions can be viewed as part of structure (Pentland, 1995), it can also generate variety within specific performances.”
From Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change (2003) · cites this paper as Pentland, 1995
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221 · see citing works
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151 · see citing works
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008 · see citing works
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020 · see citing works
Self-citationOrganizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change
Feldman, M. S. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529 · Cited by 1,969 · see citing works
Role of routines in collaborative work in healthcare organisations
Greenhalgh, T. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a2448 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Greenhalgh, T., Swinglehurst, D., & Stones, R. (2014) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr02390 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pentland, B. T.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pentland, Brian T.
- ORCID
- Pentland, Brian T.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 541-556
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2003802959
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Business Process Modeling and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Keywords
- grammatical models, action sequences, sequential data analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review