Cited by 233Business Process Modeling and AnalysisManagement and Organizational StudiesManagement Theory and Practice

Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes

Pentland, Brian T.·1995·Organization Science

Abstract

Grammar has been used metaphorically to describe organizational processes, but the metaphor has never been systematically developed so that it can be applied in empirical research. This paper develops the grammatical metaphor into a rigorous model for describing and theorizing about organizational work processes, defined here as sequences of actions that occur in the context of enabling and constraining structures. A grammatical model starts with a lexicon of elementary actions (called moves) and specifies the ways in which they can be combined to create a process. Unlike other sequential data analysis techniques, grammatical models provide a natural way of describing the layering and nesting of actions that typifies organizational processes. The example of a simple retail sales transaction is used to illustrate the underlying concepts. The paper also examines some methodological considerations involved in using process grammars and proposes an agenda for research, including: (1) creating descriptive taxonomies of organizational processes; (2) creating disconfirmable theories about the relationship between processes and the structures that enable and constrain them; (3) explaining the distribution of observed processes and predicting new processes that have not yet been observed; and (4) designing new organizational processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.6.5.541

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interdependence between actions can be viewed as part of structure, but it can also generate variety within specific performances.

    “While interdependence between actions can be viewed as part of structure (Pentland, 1995), it can also generate variety within specific performances.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pentland, B. T.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Pentland, Brian T.
Venue
Organization Science
Published
1995-10
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
541-556
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2003802959
Cited by
233
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Organization Science (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
Keywords
grammatical models, action sequences, sequential data analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review