Cited by 1,458Media Influence and HealthMedia Studies and CommunicationNarrative Theory and Analysis

Entertainment?Education and Elaboration Likelihood: Understanding the Processing of Narrative Persuasion

Slater, Michael D., Rouner, Donna·2002·Communication Theory

Abstract

The impact of entertainment-education messages on beliefs, attitudes, and behavior is typically explained in terms of social cognitive theory principles. However, important additional insights regarding reasons why entertainment-education messages have effects can be derived from the processing of persuasive content in narrative messages. Elaboration likelihood approaches suggest that absorption in a narrative, and response to characters in a narrative, should enhance persuasive effects and suppress counterarguing if the implicit persuasive content is counterattitudinal. Also, persuasion mediators and moderators such as topic involvement should be reduced in importance. Evidence in support of these propositions are reviewed in this article. Research needed to extend application of these findings to entertainment-education contexts, to further develop theory in the area of persuasion and narrative, and to better account for other persuasive effects of entertainment narrative, such as those hypothesized in cultivation theory, are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stories persuade by reducing reactance.

    “The first way in which stories persuade is that they reduce reactance (Moyer-Gusé, 2008; Slater & Rouner, 2002).”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Slater & Rouner, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Venue
Communication Theory
Published
2002-05
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
173-191
ISSN
  • 1050-3293 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2885
OpenAlex
W2165096662
Cited by
1,458
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 88 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 51
FWCI
96.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communication Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
Keywords
entertainment-education, narrative persuasion, elaboration likelihood model, narrative absorption, counterargument, cultivation theory, social cognitive theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review