The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attributions of Responsibility for Obesity: Narrative Communication Reduces Reactive Counterarguing Among Liberals
Abstract
Informed by theory and research on attributions and narrative persuasion, we compared the effectiveness of narrative and nonnarrative messages in changing attributions of responsibility for causes and solutions related to obesity in the United States. We randomly assigned 500 adults to view one of three messages (narrative, evidence, and a hybrid of the two) emphasizing environmental causes of obesity, or a no-exposure control condition. The narrative condition increased the belief that societal actors (government, employers) are responsible for addressing obesity, but only among liberals. This pattern of results was partially explained by the success of the narrative condition in reducing reactive counterarguing, relative to the evidence condition, among liberals. We conclude with theoretical and practical implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
Entman, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x · Cited by 16,203
The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 · Cited by 4,861
Danaei, G., Ding, E. L., Mozaffarian, D., Taylor, B., Rehm, J., Murray, C. J. L., & Ezzati, M. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000058 · Cited by 2,860
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21 · Cited by 1,897
Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x · Cited by 1,365
A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x · Cited by 1,159
Narratives and cancer communication
Green, M. C. (2006) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00288.x · Cited by 682
Talking about Obesity: News Framing of Who Is Responsible for Causing and Fixing the Problem
Kim, S.-H., & Anne Willis, L. (2007) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730701326051 · Cited by 426
Obesity Metaphors: How Beliefs about the Causes of Obesity Affect Support for Public Policy
BARRY, C. L., BRESCOLL, V. L., BROWNELL, K. D., & SCHLESINGER, M. (2009) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00546.x · Cited by 278
Cited by
Braddock, K., & Dillard, J. P. (2016) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555 · Cited by 568
Murphy, S. T., Frank, L. B., Chatterjee, J. S., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12007 · Cited by 536
Overcoming Resistance Through Narratives: Findings from a Meta-Analytic Review
Ratcliff, C. L., & Sun, Y. (2020) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqz017 · Cited by 170
Communication about health disparities in the mass media
Niederdeppe, J., Bigman, C. A., Gonzales, A. L., & Gollust, S. E. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12003 · Cited by 83
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Niederdeppe, J., Shapiro, M. A., & Porticella, N.
- Venue
- Human Communication Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-06-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-323
- ISSN
- 0360-3989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157284165
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 164.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attributions of Responsibility for Obesity: Narrative Communication Reduces Reactive Counterarguing Among Liberals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01409.x
- The paper
- Niederdeppe, J., Shapiro, M. A., & Porticella, N. (2011). Attributions of Responsibility for Obesity: Narrative Communication Reduces Reactive Counterarguing Among Liberals. Human Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01409.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.