Cited by 61Dermatologic Treatments and Researchmelanin and skin pigmentationDental Erosion and Treatment

The use of topical bleaching agents among women: a cross‐sectional study of knowledge, attitude and practices

AlGhamdi, KM·2010·Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract

Background Although the practice of bleaching is common worldwide, there are few studies that discuss knowledge, attitudes and practices towards bleaching. Objective The aim of this study was to explore the knowledge, attitudes and practices towards the usage of topical bleaching agents among women. Methods A self‐administered questionnaire on the use of bleaching creams was distributed randomly to women attending the outpatient clinics at a university hospital in Saudi Arabia during 2008. Results Five hundred and nine of 620 women responded (82% response rate). All the participants had dark skin (skin type 4–5). The mean age was 29.22 ± 9 years. Of the participants, 38.9% (197/506) were current users of bleaching agents. Only 26.7% (106/397) of the respondents used bleaching agents for medical purposes to treat localized abnormal skin hyper‐pigmentation; 20.8% (101/485) were ready to use any bleaching cream that gives fast results, even if the components were unknown. Of the respondents, 30% (152/509) used more than 100 g of bleaching creams monthly. These products were applied to the whole body in 7.3% of the cases. While 10.3% (28/271) continued applying the bleaching products during pregnancy, 20.8% (54/260) did so during lactation. No associations could be found between the various sociodemographic variables and differences in the attitude towards and practice of using bleaching creams. Conclusion A major proportion of our sample respondents have overused and/or misused bleaching agents. This was regardless of age, income, education or marital status. There is a need to educate women about the possible risks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03629.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
AlGhamdi, K.
Venue
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-02
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
1214-1219
ISSN
  • 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3083
OpenAlex
W2126174214
Cited by
61
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
King Saud University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental Erosion and Treatment
Keywords
skin bleaching creams, hyperpigmentation, women, knowledge, attitudes and practices, overuse, pregnancy and lactation, dark skin, health education
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Administration, Topical, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Hypertrichosis, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Saudi Arabia, Skin Pigmentation, Socioeconomic Factors, Telangiectasis, Young Adult, Bleaching Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review