Cited by 15Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchFamily and Disability Support ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

Detecting and treating depression in people with mild intellectual disability: the views of key stakeholders

McGillivray, Jane A., McCabe, Marita P.·2010·British Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Accessible summary: Some people with intellectual disability feel depressed and it is important that we find out about this early and that we try to help them. We asked some people with intellectual disability, some family and some staff about what depression is like and what sort of things led to depression in people with mild intellectual disability. The people we talked to told us that there are lots of things that might show that a person is depressed. For example, they may not want to do things, they may want to be by themselves, they may have tantrums or even hurt themselves. They also said there were lots of things that could help, like having good friends and having people to help them. Most people said it would be good if staff knew more about depression and could teach people how to cope with feeling sad. Summary: There is a pressing need for the development of programs for the early identification and treatment of depression in individuals with mild intellectual disability. The aim of this study was to ascertain the perspective of 64 key stakeholders (people with intellectual disability, healthcare professionals, family/caregivers & support workers) regarding the risk factors and characteristics of depression, the support and service needs of individuals with intellectual disability/depression and those who care for them. Findings enhance our understanding of depression and its risk factors in people with mild intellectual disability and endorse the need for the development of screening and intervention programs suitable for delivery by staff in agencies providing services to people with mild intellectual disability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2009.00573.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGillivray, J. A., & McCabe, M. P.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • McGillivray, Jane A.
  • McCabe, Marita P.
Venue
British Journal of Learning Disabilities
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-18
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
68-76
ISSN
  • 0261-9997 (ISSN-L)
  • 1354-4187
  • 1468-3156
OpenAlex
W1999744214
Cited by
15
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, mild intellectual disability, early detection of depression, depression treatment, risk factors for depression, stakeholder perspectives, people with intellectual disabilities, family caregivers, support staff, healthcare workers, screening programs, intervention program, service needs, self-harm, social isolation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review