Cited by 33Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchDisability Rights and RepresentationInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Inclusion and healthcare choices: the experiences of adults with learning disabilities

Ferguson, Morag, Jarrett, Dominic, Terras, Melody·2011·British Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Accessible summary People with learning disabilities do not get to make as many choices as other people. This project looked at the choices people make about everyday things and about health services. We spoke to people with learning disabilities, their carers and Physiotherapy staff. We found that people with a learning disability were making choices about everyday things but felt that other people made choices about health services for them. We found that carers and healthcare staff need support to understand how difficult it can be to make choices, and how they can help people with a learning disability to make choices. Summary People with learning disabilities have fewer choice opportunities than the general population. Existing research provides some insight, but the choice‐making experiences of those who do not always utilise available healthcare remains under‐explored. This research explored the choice‐making experiences of two groups of individuals with a learning disability: (Group 1 – Irregular attenders) those who had opted out of healthcare appointments for avoidable reasons; and (Group 2 – Regular attenders) those who had attended all appointments or not attended for unavoidable reasons. Interviews were carried out with people with learning disabilities (N = 4) and/or their primary carer (N = 13). In addition to these interviews, Physiotherapy staff participated in a focus group (Group 3). The interviewed individuals with learning disabilities described experiences of and opportunities for making everyday choices but generally identified ‘others’ as being responsible for making their healthcare choices. Greater understanding of the healthcare expectations and experiences of individuals with learning disabilities, carers and healthcare staff is required to support people with learning disabilities as active healthcare decision‐makers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2010.00620.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with intellectual disabilities and/or autism value healthcare professionals, their support network, and other professionals who work closely with them and who have specialist knowledge and experience of working with people who have intellectual disabilities.

    “People with intellectual disabilities and/or autism value healthcare professionals, their support network, and other professionals who work closely with them and who have specialist knowledge and experience of working with people who have intellectual disabilities.26,67–72”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferguson, M., Jarrett, D., & Terras, M.
Affiliations
  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GB)
  • NHS Ayrshire and Arran (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Learning Disabilities
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-11
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
73-83
ISSN
  • 0261-9997 (ISSN-L)
  • 1354-4187
  • 1468-3156
OpenAlex
W1543703962
Cited by
33
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
learning disabilities, patient autonomy, caregivers, physiotherapy, healthcare decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review