Cited by 10Dental Health and Care UtilizationDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchMental Health and Patient Involvement

What should dental services for people with disabilities in Ireland be like? Agreed priorities from a focus group of people with learning disabilities

Mac Giolla Phadraig, Caoimhin, Dougall, Alison, Stapleton, Siobhan, McGeown, Danielle, Nunn, June, Guerin, Suzanne·2016·British Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Accessible summary: This study asked a group of people with learning disabilities in Ireland what was important to them about their dental services. The group easily ordered their priorities according to five topics:Access, Cost, Information, Quality of Care and Treatment. The group's discussion revealed a disempowered group who had little control over how they interacted with dental services. We suggest ways to empower people with learning disabilities in their interactions with dental services. Background:In Ireland, people with learning disabilities have poor oral health. This is in part due to inappropriate oral health services. Recognising the value of inclusive approaches to research and healthcare planning, this study sought to include a group of people with learning disabilities in priority setting for oral health services in Ireland. This study discusses the feasibility of the methods used to promote inclusive approaches in oral healthcare planning. Materials and Methods:A single focus group of six participants with communication and cognitive impairments agreed priorities for dental services using evidence‐based research tools across five topics:Access, Cost, Information, Quality of Care and Treatment. Sorting was recorded photographically and discussion was video‐recorded, transcribed and analysed using deductive content analysis. Results:The group ranked priorities within each topic but found it difficult to meaningfully rank between topics. Across topics, issues of control, empowerment and choice were observed. Conclusions:Participants were largely disempowered in their interactions with dental services. The method used in this study to empower potential service users with disabilities was successful and can be used by others who have an interest in inclusive healthcare priority setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bld.12152

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mac Giolla Phadraig, C., Dougall, A., Stapleton, S., McGeown, D., Nunn, J., & Guerin, S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Child and Public Dental Health Trinity College Dublin Dublin Dental University Hospital Lincoln Place Dublin 2 Ireland
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • School of Psychology University College Dublin Stillorgan Road Dublin 4 Ireland
Venue
British Journal of Learning Disabilities
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-21
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
259-268
ISSN
  • 0261-9997 (ISSN-L)
  • 1354-4187
  • 1468-3156
OpenAlex
W2173931418
Cited by
10
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
learning disabilities, dental services, oral health, priority setting, inclusive healthcare, patient empowerment, service user involvement, access to dental care, Ireland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review