Cited by 239Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies

Socio‐historical paths of the male breadwinner model – an explanation of cross‐national differences1

Pfau‐Effinger, Birgit·2004·The British Journal of Sociology

Abstract

It is often assumed that in the historical transformation to modern industrial society, the integration of women into the economy occurred everywhere as a three‐phase process: in pre‐modern societies, the extensive integration of women into societal production; then, their wide exclusion with the shift to industrial society; and finally, their re‐integration into paid work during the further course of modernization. Results from the author's own international comparative study of the historical development of the family and the economic integration of women have shown that this was decidedly not the case even for western Europe. Hence the question arises: why is there such historical variation in the development and importance of the housewife model of the male breadwinner family? In the article, an explanation is presented. It is argued that the historical development of the urban bourgeoisie was especially significant for the historical destiny of this cultural model: the social and political strength of the urban bourgeoisie had central societal importance in the imposition of the housewife model of the male breadwinner family as the dominant family form in a given society. In this, it is necessary to distinguish between the imposition of the breadwinner marriage at the cultural level on the one hand, and at the level of social practice in the family on the other.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00025.x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfau‐Effinger, B.
Affiliations
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Pfau‐Effinger, Birgit
Venue
The British Journal of Sociology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-09
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
377-399
ISSN
  • 0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4446
OpenAlex
W2122717937
Cited by
239
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 15
FWCI
12.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Keywords
male breadwinner model, family history, women's economic integration, urban bourgeoisie, cross-national variation, industrialization, gender roles, family forms
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Employment, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Social Change, Sociology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review