Cited by 170Face Recognition and PerceptionSocial Robot Interaction and HRIAesthetic Perception and Analysis

Categorization difficulty is associated with negative evaluation in the “uncanny valley” phenomenon

Open access
YAMADA, YUKI, KAWABE, TAKAHIRO, IHAYA, KEIKO·2013·Japanese Psychological Research

Abstract

Abstract Human observers often experience strongly negative impressions of human‐like objects falling within a particular range of visual similarity to real humans (the “uncanny valley” phenomenon). We hypothesized that negative impressions in the uncanny valley phenomenon are related to a difficulty in object categorization. We produced stimulus images by morphing two of each of real, stuffed, and cartoon human face images (Experiment 1). Observers were asked to categorize each of these images as either category and evaluated the likability of the image. The results revealed that the longest latency, the highest ambiguity in categorization, and the lowest likability score co‐occurred at consistent morphing percentages. Similar results were obtained even when we employed stimulus images that were created by morphing two of each of real, stuffed, and cartoon dog images (Experiment 2). However, the effect of categorization difficulty on evaluation was weak when two real human faces were morphed (Experiment 3). These results suggest that the difficulty in categorizing an object as either of two dissimilar categories is linked to negative evaluation regardless of whether the object is human‐related or not.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2012.00538.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hanson, D. (2006). Exploring the aesthetic range for humanoid robots. In K. MacDorman & H. Ishig- uro (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICCS/CogSci-2006 Symposium: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, pp. 16-20.
  2. MacDorman, K. F. (2005). Androids as experimental apparatus: Why is there an uncanny valley and can we exploit it? CogSci-2005 Workshop: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, pp. 108-118.
  3. Ramey, C. H. (2005). The uncanny valley of similari- ties concerning abortion, baldness, heaps of sand, and humanlike robots. Proceedings of the Views of the Uncanny Valley Workshop, IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 8-13.
  4. Schultz, C. M. (2004). The complete Peanuts 1950- 1952. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Fantagraphics Books.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
YAMADA, Y., KAWABE, T., & IHAYA, K.
Affiliations
  • Yamaguchi University (JP)
  • NTT (Japan) (JP)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
Corresponding author
YAMADA, YUKI
Venue
Japanese Psychological Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09-03
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
20-32
ISSN
  • 0021-5368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5884
OpenAlex
W2122384877
Cited by
170
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Japanese Psychological Research (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Kyushu University Institutional Repository (QIR) (Kyushu University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
uncanny valley, negative evaluation, face perception, likeability, cartoon faces, stuffed animals, dogs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review